Does Acts Support the Trilemma 1 @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Does Acts Support the Trilemma 1  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded September 2023 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
This week I'm starting a series about this question: Does Acts support the idea that at least twelve specific, named individuals were willing to risk their lives for the claim that they had seen Jesus risen from the dead?

Some skeptics have claimed that *even if we take Acts at face value* in its account of the early days of Christianity, it still doesn't support this claim. They may downplay the seriousness of the risk. They may imply that only Peter and John among the original twelve disciples actually stood up and took a risk or that the others stopped taking a risk after the religious leaders first told them to stop preaching.

Paulogia claims this here: youtu.be/9omTjcRwd1M?si=ej6dI2K75yYvjdcy

In the coming weeks I'll be addressing these claims from Acts itself. Here I am setting up the question.

Remember, this is addressing what we can learn from Acts itself if we take the narrative at face value about who was proclaiming the resurrection and what they were risking.

(Thumbnail courtesy of freebibleimages.org.)
Does Acts Support the Trilemma 1Arguments From Silence And Bad AnalogiesAlleged Seams in the Gospel of John 1Alleged Seams in John Part 7: No one is asking where Jesus is going?Authorship of John Part 1: IntroductionUnstated Gospel symbolism: Its too easy!Virgin Birth and Resurrection: No epistemological mysteryUndesigned Coincidences: To his servantsAre apologetic sections in the resurrection stories suspicious?Undesigned Coincidences in Secular History: Wheres Paoli?3 Principles for Max Data and ContradictionsEditorial fatigue, Probably Not 6
Lydia McGrew |

Does Acts Support the Trilemma 1

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER