Uploaded December 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
DONATIONS TO CHARITY MATCHED THIS WEEK!!:
I do not ask for contributions. Instead, please support the work of Health in Harmony, which trades forest protections for health care. See my video here: youtube.com/watch?v=j9-GRugP9pU for an explanation of their work.
Donations will be worth double for the next week, and possibly to the end of the month. Please donate here: healthinharmony.org/donate
Health in Harmony also has a live website: healthinharmony.org
CORRECTIONS:
1) Someone posted: "A 10x increase is actually an increase of 900%, not 1000%. Remember that an increase of 100% is 2x."
2) And another example of how my math sucks: "@williamverhoef4349 wrote:
At 9:34: 10/10,000 = 1/1000 = 0.001 = 0.1%"
3) A couple of people pointed out that the spike in Google searches for 'flat Earth' following Lamar's announcement does not mean they all started believing in a flat Earth. i should have said they 'became interested' in a flat Earth.
This video has been re-uploaded for several reasons:
1) I got a lot of 'complaints' that the two Dunning-Kruger effect graphs I used are not in the Kruger and Dunning study. I never said they were, of course, and it should be pretty obvious that these are just drawings designed to illustrate what has become known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. This was in the video description, but a lot of people did not read it.
2) There were a couple of occasions when I wrong attributed principles to the Kruger and Dunning paper, rather than the Kruger-Dunning effect. That was a mistake, which I am now happy to correct in the video. If you don't mind me saying so, that is the difference between research and Do-your-own-research. When you research something and discover it's wrong, you correct yourself, and go with what is correct. When you DYOR, you look for what you believe in and refuse to correct it, even when it turns out to be wrong.
3) The Dunning-Kruger Effect was never in Kruger and Dunning paper, which is why I made the distinction. The former is a principle popularised and inspired by the paper. Again, I made that clear in the video description, but this time it has been spelled out in the video itself.
My apologies to those who had already started discussions in the other comments section. Please continue them here.
SOURCES:
The Kruger and Dunning study can be found here:
researchgate.net/publication/12688660_Unskilled_and_Unaware_of_It_How_Difficulties_in_Recognizing_One's_Own_Incompetence_Lead_to_Inflated_Self-Assessments
My two videos responding to Academic Agent and his Maldives claim can be found here:
youtu.be/7aQqTFGxrmg
youtu.be/41TCWEl-x_g
Also, an interview with Academic Agent, here:
youtu.be/CNt2nbgRTQc
The video showing Jonathan DuHamel's confusion over a scientific paper can be found here:
youtu.be/CcmCBetoR18
My debate with Tony Heller can be found here:
Heller’s opener: youtube.com/watch?v=uE-zY0roNfw
My rebuttal: youtube.com/watch?v=WLjkLPnIPPw
Heller: youtube.com/watch?v=XjdT-NdSoWM
Me: youtube.com/watch?v=weQ-N4iymrQ
Heller: youtube.com/watch?v=XycF0uCuByQ
Me: youtube.com/watch?v=V5fncpSikwk
Heller: (refused to continue)
The DIY sea level rise measurer lives in NC, where more accurate measurements can be seen heer:
deq.nc.gov/2024-north-carolina-sea-level-rise-science-update/open
DONATIONS TO CHARITY MATCHED THIS WEEK!!:
I do not ask for contributions. Instead, please support the work of Health in Harmony, which trades forest protections for health care. See my video here: youtube.com/watch?v=j9-GRugP9pU for an explanation of their work.
Donations will be worth double for the next week, and possibly to the end of the month. Please donate here: healthinharmony.org/donate
Health in Harmony also has a live website: healthinharmony.org
CORRECTIONS:
1) Someone posted: "A 10x increase is actually an increase of 900%, not 1000%. Remember that an increase of 100% is 2x."
2) And another example of how my math sucks: "@williamverhoef4349 wrote:
At 9:34: 10/10,000 = 1/1000 = 0.001 = 0.1%"
3) A couple of people pointed out that the spike in Google searches for 'flat Earth' following Lamar's announcement does not mean they all started believing in a flat Earth. i should have said they 'became interested' in a flat Earth.
This video has been re-uploaded for several reasons:
1) I got a lot of 'complaints' that the two Dunning-Kruger effect graphs I used are not in the Kruger and Dunning study. I never said they were, of course, and it should be pretty obvious that these are just drawings designed to illustrate what has become known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. This was in the video description, but a lot of people did not read it.
2) There were a couple of occasions when I wrong attributed principles to the Kruger and Dunning paper, rather than the Kruger-Dunning effect. That was a mistake, which I am now happy to correct in the video. If you don't mind me saying so, that is the difference between research and Do-your-own-research. When you research something and discover it's wrong, you correct yourself, and go with what is correct. When you DYOR, you look for what you believe in and refuse to correct it, even when it turns out to be wrong.
3) The Dunning-Kruger Effect was never in Kruger and Dunning paper, which is why I made the distinction. The former is a principle popularised and inspired by the paper. Again, I made that clear in the video description, but this time it has been spelled out in the video itself.
My apologies to those who had already started discussions in the other comments section. Please continue them here.
SOURCES:
The Kruger and Dunning study can be found here:
researchgate.net/publication/12688660_Unskilled_and_Unaware_of_It_How_Difficulties_in_Recognizing_One's_Own_Incompetence_Lead_to_Inflated_Self-Assessments
My two videos responding to Academic Agent and his Maldives claim can be found here:
youtu.be/7aQqTFGxrmg
youtu.be/41TCWEl-x_g
Also, an interview with Academic Agent, here:
youtu.be/CNt2nbgRTQc
The video showing Jonathan DuHamel's confusion over a scientific paper can be found here:
youtu.be/CcmCBetoR18
My debate with Tony Heller can be found here:
Heller’s opener: youtube.com/watch?v=uE-zY0roNfw
My rebuttal: youtube.com/watch?v=WLjkLPnIPPw
Heller: youtube.com/watch?v=XjdT-NdSoWM
Me: youtube.com/watch?v=weQ-N4iymrQ
Heller: youtube.com/watch?v=XycF0uCuByQ
Me: youtube.com/watch?v=V5fncpSikwk
Heller: (refused to continue)
The DIY sea level rise measurer lives in NC, where more accurate measurements can be seen heer:
deq.nc.gov/2024-north-carolina-sea-level-rise-science-update/open




![Fact checking claims about lockdown (and Sweden)
CORRECTIONS:
@7:05 I said papers published in the Lancet reached the opposite conclusion. In fact they didnt say mortality is reduced through lockdown, only that the rate of infection is reduced. See the correction video linked, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WQLnjegW4E
@7:11 I show a paper that concludes [Lockdowns] were associated with reductions in R... and lifting internal movement limits were associated with increases of R.
In fact that screenshot comes from a different Lancet paper, The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.
The paper shown at 7:11 concludes: Lockdown therefore appears to
have been successful not only in alleviating the burden on the intensive
care units of the two most severely affected regions of France, but also in preventing uncontrolled epidemics in other regions.
@8:27 - Koch should be pronounced coke in the USA.
@14:07 - I said most Swedes live alone. I should have said most households are only one person.
@16:04 & 18:52 - This is an old news article. For an article about the grounding of Swedish aircraft due to Covid-19, see https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/coronavirus-flight-cancelled-airline-suspended-austrian-lot-polish-sas-a9404886.html
@18:20 - I said the Swedish healthcare system is free. In fact there is a small charge. Swedes in the forum say the cost of an intensive care bed is about $12 a day. This compares with hundreds of dollars in the USA.
@19:59 I show the page for Sweden instead of Norway. See https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region/norway for the correct page.
Swedish guidelines Nov 24:
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/the-public-health-agency-of-sweden/communicable-disease-control/covid-19/local-general-guidelines/
JAMA article:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2771841?alert=article
Swedish government Restrictions and prohibitions
https://www.krisinformation.se/en/hazards-and-risks/disasters-and-incidents/2020/official-information-on-the-new-coronavirus/restriktioner-och-forbud
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/370/bmj.m3026.full.pdf
Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network — Tenforde et al , Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2020
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6930e1.htm. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1 pmid:32730238
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768351 Fact checking claims about lockdown (and Sweden)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v341VNPgL50/mqdefault.jpg)





