Do NOT Get your Science from WLCraig, Part 1 (Re: Krauss, Craig Debate)  @dewinthemorning
Do NOT Get your Science from WLCraig, Part 1 (Re: Krauss, Craig Debate)  @dewinthemorning
dewinthemorning | Do NOT Get your Science from WLCraig, Part 1 (Re: Krauss, Craig Debate) @dewinthemorning | Uploaded May 2011 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
Response to this videos:

youtube.com/watch?v=0K6-M_ZwaXk
youtube.com/watch?v=DOwLG0GSIh8&feature=related

A start of a series of a few videos, which show that Craig is not strong in science. In this video I expose him as a perpetrator of linguistic crimes. He doesn't have the right to use phrases like "abstract objects", "herd morality", "on the atheistic view, morality is JUST social conditioning and biological evolution"...

Moreover, he doesn't have a definition for his god. A link to the question for a definition for god, to which he didn't give an answer:

reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8779
Do NOT Get your Science from WLCraig, Part 1 (Re: Krauss, Craig Debate)Who Can Guess 1 Lie out of 5 Stories? - Tagged by kalsolarUKHegels Idealism, The State, Dialectics and Karl MarxFaith - Intellectual WeaselryThe Detection of God Is Imminent! - WL Craig on the Higgs BosonWhy Dont We Miss the Martians, Inmendham?The Kalam Argument Is Pushing Up The Daisies. RIP!Karl Marx - The Roots of German Classical PhilosophyDo NOT Let Craig Rape your Mind with Being and Nothing!Karl Marx - DialecticsWL Craig - Is The Trinity a Myth?Reduction and Levels of Selection (Dawkins & the Selfish Gene) - Part IX

Do NOT Get your Science from WLCraig, Part 1 (Re: Krauss, Craig Debate) @dewinthemorning

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER