Uploaded May 2026 | Updated September 2026, 14 hours ago
How quantum is life? FQxI's latest $53,000 essay competition invited scientists and the public to debate this question. In this episode Zeeya Merali chats with FQxI's Gabe Fitzpatrick about the winning essays, which were announced in February.
Winners announced: qspace.fqxi.org/competitions/winners/17
Competition launch episode on quantum biology and plant intelligence with Catalina Curceanu: qspace.fqxi.org/podcasts/125/2025.10.03
Gabe interviewed five of the winners: Gabriela Frajtag, Gerard McCaul, Michael Montague, Aswathy Prakash Thekkepurakkal Prakashan and Rishab Ghosh.
And reporter Miriam Frankel asked astrophysicist Bernard Schutz about co-founding the first open access living review journal, Living Reviews in Relativity, dubbed the "Wikipedia of Science" in the 1990s, and about his own research claims that ripples in spacetime helped humans to evolve.
The Wikipedia of Science: qspace.fqxi.org/articles/279/living-reviews-the-wikipedia-of-science
How quantum is life? FQxI's latest $53,000 essay competition invited scientists and the public to debate this question. In this episode Zeeya Merali chats with FQxI's Gabe Fitzpatrick about the winning essays, which were announced in February.
Winners announced: qspace.fqxi.org/competitions/winners/17
Competition launch episode on quantum biology and plant intelligence with Catalina Curceanu: qspace.fqxi.org/podcasts/125/2025.10.03
Gabe interviewed five of the winners: Gabriela Frajtag, Gerard McCaul, Michael Montague, Aswathy Prakash Thekkepurakkal Prakashan and Rishab Ghosh.
And reporter Miriam Frankel asked astrophysicist Bernard Schutz about co-founding the first open access living review journal, Living Reviews in Relativity, dubbed the "Wikipedia of Science" in the 1990s, and about his own research claims that ripples in spacetime helped humans to evolve.
The Wikipedia of Science: qspace.fqxi.org/articles/279/living-reviews-the-wikipedia-of-science







![Neuroscientists test the idea that what we see when we perceive the world is an internal projection.
You are walking across a vast grass field on a misty morning when you suddenly spot a lake in the distance. As you get closer, you notice a lone duck swimming peacefully across it. But this image doesnt last. After walking another ten yards, you realise your mistake—it isnt a duck but a plastic bottle. Your perfectly smooth conscious image changes rather abruptly, flipping seamlessly from duck to bottle.
Conscious visual perception—what we are conscious of seeing—is typically explained by light bouncing off the various items around us and hitting our eyes retina. The signal then travels to the back of our brain for visual processing and is fed forward through more complex areas until the brain can generate a perfectly coherent conscious image. A similar process takes place for other types of perception. But this raises a puzzle: if true, why is our conscious perception seemingly so perfect, lacking gaps even while we struggle to discern something?
[By Miriam Frankel]: https://qspace.fqxi.org/articles/258/seeing-is-believing Neuroscientists test the idea that what we see when we perceive the world is an internal projection.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SUo1L_vUbkE/mqdefault.jpg)


