Democrats Had Blinders on the Whole Time @MichaelSmerconish
Democrats Had Blinders on the Whole Time  @MichaelSmerconish
Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Did Democrats ignore obvious warning signs because they were so focused on defeating Republicans?

Michael Smerconish argues the allegations dominating Graham Platner's campaign may have ended it—but the earlier controversies should have been enough long before voters reached this point. He explains why political parties can't afford to ignore character concerns simply because a candidate seems electable.

Should winning ever outweigh judgment?
Vote on today's poll and subscribe to the daily newsletter at smerconish.com
Democrats Had Blinders on the Whole TimeAgree with this move by the University of Michigan?Safety or Surveillance: The Debate Over Flock CamerasWhy I would have carried Trumps Speech LIVECan the DSAs energy translate into victories where it matters most?Who does Donald Trump *really* need by his side?Smerconish on Dolly Parton: The Last of Something We All Have in CommonTrump Didn’t Save Paxton—He Was Already WinningAmerica’s Got Talent Finalist Roasts Michael Smerconish LiveDid Trump steal his “51st state” threat to Canada while watching a late night movie?Trump’s Closest Aide Is Suddenly Making HeadlinesEven the Secret Service ... didnt need to know the details of what plane the president was in.
Michael Smerconish |

Democrats Had Blinders on the Whole Time

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER