PBS Infinite Series | Defining Infinity | Infinite Series @pbsinfiniteseries | Uploaded 6 years ago | Updated 3 hours ago
Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/donateinfi
Set theory is supposed to be a foundation of all of mathematics. How does it handle infinity? Learn through active problem-solving at Brilliant: brilliant.org/InfiniteSeries
Tweet at us! @pbsinfinite
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsinfinite series
Email us! pbsinfiniteseries [at] gmail [dot] com
Previous Episode:
Unraveling DNA with Rational Tangles
youtube.com/watch?v=JXGyXtNsu14
Earlier videos referenced around 1:00 are:
Cantor's paradox: youtube.com/watch?v=TbeA1rhV0D0
What are Numbers Made of? youtube.com/watch?v=S4zfmcTC5bM
Peano axioms: youtube.com/watch?v=3gBoP8jZ1Is
Hiearchy of Infinities: youtube.com/watch?v=i7c2qz7sO0I
Vsauce How to Count Past Infinity
youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
Brilliant infinity wiki:
brilliant.org/wiki/infinity
Brilliant Number Theory course (with Exploring Infinity chapter):
brilliant.org/courses/basic-number-theory
Set theory arose in part to get a grip on infinity. Early “naive” versions were beset by apparent paradoxes and were superseded by axiomatic versions that used formal rules to demarcate "legal" mathematical statements from gibberish.
Written and Hosted by Gabe Perez-Giz (@fizziksgabe)
Produced by Rusty Ward
Graphics by Ray Lux
Assistant Editing and Sound Design by Mike Petrow and Linda Huang
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Special thanks to Roman Pinchuk for supporting us on our Converse level on Patreon.
Along with thanks to Matthew O'Connor, Yana Chernobilsky, and John Hoffman who are supporting us on Patreon at the Identity level!
And thanks to Mauricio Pacheco and Andrew Poelstra who is supporting us at the Lemma level!
Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/donateinfi
Set theory is supposed to be a foundation of all of mathematics. How does it handle infinity? Learn through active problem-solving at Brilliant: brilliant.org/InfiniteSeries
Tweet at us! @pbsinfinite
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsinfinite series
Email us! pbsinfiniteseries [at] gmail [dot] com
Previous Episode:
Unraveling DNA with Rational Tangles
youtube.com/watch?v=JXGyXtNsu14
Earlier videos referenced around 1:00 are:
Cantor's paradox: youtube.com/watch?v=TbeA1rhV0D0
What are Numbers Made of? youtube.com/watch?v=S4zfmcTC5bM
Peano axioms: youtube.com/watch?v=3gBoP8jZ1Is
Hiearchy of Infinities: youtube.com/watch?v=i7c2qz7sO0I
Vsauce How to Count Past Infinity
youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
Brilliant infinity wiki:
brilliant.org/wiki/infinity
Brilliant Number Theory course (with Exploring Infinity chapter):
brilliant.org/courses/basic-number-theory
Set theory arose in part to get a grip on infinity. Early “naive” versions were beset by apparent paradoxes and were superseded by axiomatic versions that used formal rules to demarcate "legal" mathematical statements from gibberish.
Written and Hosted by Gabe Perez-Giz (@fizziksgabe)
Produced by Rusty Ward
Graphics by Ray Lux
Assistant Editing and Sound Design by Mike Petrow and Linda Huang
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Special thanks to Roman Pinchuk for supporting us on our Converse level on Patreon.
Along with thanks to Matthew O'Connor, Yana Chernobilsky, and John Hoffman who are supporting us on Patreon at the Identity level!
And thanks to Mauricio Pacheco and Andrew Poelstra who is supporting us at the Lemma level!
