Uploaded July 2021 | Updated September 2026, 16 hours ago
I’m responding to the “scientific black pill” that has been gathered by the incel community, although this is a critical video, it is mostly a review of the scientific black pill as well as some parts of their philosophy. I tried to be as neutral as possible, but you be the judge.
Table of Contents:
00:00 Introduction
02:38 Foreword and (Watch this before watching the rest of the video)
04:45 Sexual Differences in Attraction
10:18 Instances where the Black Pill is correct
12:12 The Fatal Flaws of the Black Pill (I have referenced a lot before so it's technically a continuation)
20:28 The Conclusion
Links:
Odysse: odysee.com/@UBERSOY:f
Twitter: twitter.com/UBERSOY1
Telegram: https://t.me/UBERSOY1
Support me at Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ubersoy
Support me via Ethereum: 0xbD5Ad7FAD05AE8D5e781600426fD7fE02566184a
Support me on PayPal: paypal.com/paypalme/UBERSOY
Support me on Subscribestar: subscribestar.com/ubersoy
Minecraft: ubersoy.mcserver.at
https://t.me/history_memes_official
https://t.me/history_quizzes
References:
opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/chapter/initial-attraction
journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470490800600209
semanticscholar.org/paper/Mate-preferences-in-the-US-and-Singapore%3A-A-test-of-Li-Valentine/00216ad840334e74c5ef2c586a059275ef3eaaa0
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961442
researchgate.net/publication/322128430_Different_impacts_of_resources_on_opposite_sex_ratings_of_physical_attractiveness_by_males_and_females
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147470490800600209
washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/12/in-experiments-researchers-figured-out-what-men-and-women-really-want-in-a-mate
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147470490800600407
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/49222/Margaret_McCarthy-Margaret_McCarthy-Hot_or_Not.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.201846477
https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/11/30/1519901.htm
researchgate.net/publication/252506166_Partner_wealth_predicts_self-reported_orgasm_frequency_in_a_sample_of_Chinese_women
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168035
toddkshackelford.com/downloads/Shackelford-Schmitt-Buss-PAID-2005.pdf
https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)
https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3355/chapter-abstract/109952/Kindness-Fidelity-and-Other-Sexually-Selected?redirectedFrom=fulltext
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dating-and-mating/201701/why-physical-attraction-matters-and-when-it-might-not
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/head-games/201704/do-beautiful-people-have-better-relationships
#incels #blackpill
I’m responding to the “scientific black pill” that has been gathered by the incel community, although this is a critical video, it is mostly a review of the scientific black pill as well as some parts of their philosophy. I tried to be as neutral as possible, but you be the judge.
Table of Contents:
00:00 Introduction
02:38 Foreword and (Watch this before watching the rest of the video)
04:45 Sexual Differences in Attraction
10:18 Instances where the Black Pill is correct
12:12 The Fatal Flaws of the Black Pill (I have referenced a lot before so it's technically a continuation)
20:28 The Conclusion
Links:
Odysse: odysee.com/@UBERSOY:f
Twitter: twitter.com/UBERSOY1
Telegram: https://t.me/UBERSOY1
Support me at Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ubersoy
Support me via Ethereum: 0xbD5Ad7FAD05AE8D5e781600426fD7fE02566184a
Support me on PayPal: paypal.com/paypalme/UBERSOY
Support me on Subscribestar: subscribestar.com/ubersoy
Minecraft: ubersoy.mcserver.at
https://t.me/history_memes_official
https://t.me/history_quizzes
References:
opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/chapter/initial-attraction
journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470490800600209
semanticscholar.org/paper/Mate-preferences-in-the-US-and-Singapore%3A-A-test-of-Li-Valentine/00216ad840334e74c5ef2c586a059275ef3eaaa0
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5961442
researchgate.net/publication/322128430_Different_impacts_of_resources_on_opposite_sex_ratings_of_physical_attractiveness_by_males_and_females
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147470490800600209
washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/12/in-experiments-researchers-figured-out-what-men-and-women-really-want-in-a-mate
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/147470490800600407
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/49222/Margaret_McCarthy-Margaret_McCarthy-Hot_or_Not.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.201846477
https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/11/30/1519901.htm
researchgate.net/publication/252506166_Partner_wealth_predicts_self-reported_orgasm_frequency_in_a_sample_of_Chinese_women
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168035
toddkshackelford.com/downloads/Shackelford-Schmitt-Buss-PAID-2005.pdf
https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)
https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/3355/chapter-abstract/109952/Kindness-Fidelity-and-Other-Sexually-Selected?redirectedFrom=fulltext
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dating-and-mating/201701/why-physical-attraction-matters-and-when-it-might-not
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/head-games/201704/do-beautiful-people-have-better-relationships
#incels #blackpill
