Uploaded October 2021 | Updated September 2026, 4 days ago

---

Can an evolutionary biologist with PhD in molecular biology defend the Extended Modern Evolutionary Synthesis' ability for producing novelty?!
I don't think so! So, check out the debate and make your mind too!

Creatures have astounding variation, with novelty distributed among living beings. From gills to lungs, scales to hairs to feathers, from totally blind to composite eyes, ears to sensing electric waves, and much more.
Can the Theory of Evolution give a proper explanation to that spectrum of novelty given its primary mechanisms of Random Mutation acting on Natural Selection?!

I debate Prof Dr. Danial Stern, PhD on the topic.
Dan Ster: Affirmative position
Myself: Negative

===
Dan's channel: @CreationMyths : youtube.com/c/CreationMyths
Dapper's channel (mod): @DapperDinosaur : youtube.com/channel/UCCOGbuDrLeDBqIR8vBlE-yA

===
For more like this:
Don't forget to subscribe to the website for content notifications, courses, and more:
Telegram: https://t.me/findingtruthchannel
Web: findingtruthchannel.com/register
FB: facebook.com/c/findingturthchannel
YT: YouTube.com/c/findingtruthchannel
===
#Evolution #FindingTruth #DanSternCardinal #DapperDino

Join Live, like, and share with loved ones:
youtu.be/unCk53z5eFI