Emerson Green | DEBATE: Is God Finite? @EmersonGreen | Uploaded 1 year ago | Updated 1 hour ago
Alex Strasser and John Buck debate the merits of finite theism, the view that God is limited in power. Theistic finitism is less vulnerable to the problem of evil than perfect being theism, but are there other trade-offs that make the notion of a finite God less defensible overall?

John is defending the view that strong versions of omnipotence avoid problems of vagueness, arbitrariness, ad hocness, lack of predictive power, and complexity that limited models of God suffer from. John also thinks that a new problem of evil arises that is particular only to limited views of God.

Alex will give a cosmological argument and fine-tuning argument for finite theism, and further argue that omni-theism is not a fruitful research program due to serious issues with coherence and the analysis of omni-properties. Theistic finitism is rarely discussed in the philosophy of religion, and Alex wants to invite us to take finite theism more seriously and to investigate it carefully.

Summary of theistic finitism: britannica.com/topic/theism/The-idea-of-a-finite-God

Previous limited god debate: youtu.be/K8f5gensQF0?si=SjGkdvxlaWH01MVs

Linktree https://linktr.ee/emersongreen


/ timestamps /

00:00 Introduction
03:41 John's Opening
22:00 Alex's Opening
39:16 Problem of Evil
1:02:51 God's Power
1:16:26 Miracles & the Bible
1:22:22 Simplicity as a Theoretical Virtue
1:29:53 Fine-tuning Redux
1:55:19 Biblical & Theological Constraints
2:03:30 Necessity
2:06:30 Worship & Hell
2:17:46 Parting Thoughts