Debate Evolution Intelligent Design 8of8 @djarm67

djarm67 | Debate Evolution Intelligent Design 8of8 @djarm67 | Uploaded October 2008 | Updated October 2024, 2 hours ago.
An evolution debate tag team on the teaching of intelligent design creationism in science classrooms. This debate predates the Kitzmiller trial and pits some of the participants. Defending the scientific position was Michael Ruse, Eugenie Scott, Kenneth Miller and Barry Lynne. Defending the intelligent design creationist position was David Berlinski, Michael Behe, Phillip johnson and William Buckley.

youtube.com/view_play_list?p=EE00366221C6663E

Expelled - Mark Mathis vs Scientific American 1of8

Evolution Intelligent Design debate Meyer V Ward 11of11

Lord Monckton bringing the climate crazy to NZ

Here Be Dragons - Critical analysis of pseudoscience 1of5

Eugenie Scott - Intelligent Design Creationism 6of10

Expelled - Mark Mathis vs Scientific American 8of8

$Dinosaur to bird evolution 5of5 Todays scientists are recreating dinosaurs through genetic engineering. Sounds like science fiction? Not any longer. Through rapid advances in genetics, scientists are discovering the genetic traits of dinosaurs in the DNA of birds. They are showing that it is possible to bring back teeth, long tails and hands in place of wings. In Dinosaurs: Return to Life, learn why the dream of recreating the dinosaur genome is coming closer to reality. Ever since Mary Higby Schweitzer peeked inside the fractured thighbone of a Tyrannosaurus rex, the introverted scientists life hasnt been the same. Neither has the field of paleontology. In 2004, Schweitzer gazed through a microscope in her laboratory at North Carolina State University and saw lifelike tissue that had no business inhabiting a fossilized dinosaur skeleton: fibrous matrix, stretchy like a wet scab on human skin; what appeared to be supple bone cells, their three-dimensional shapes intact; and translucent blood vessels that looked as if they could have come straight from an ostrich at the zoo. An alternate hypothesis has been suggested that the soft tissues are in actual fact bacterial biofilms. Kaye TG, Gaugler G, Sawlowicz Z (2008) Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms. Whilst certain organisations continue to parrot the phrase no transitional fossils have ever been found the list of species which possess transitional features continues to grow. Epidexipteryx hui, Protoavis, Protarchaeopteryx, Archeopteryx, Avimimus, Sinosauropteryx, Caudipteryx, Rahonavis, Shuvuuia, Sinornithosaurus, Beipiasaurus, Microraptor, Nomingia, Epidendrosaurus, Cryptovolans, Scansoriopteryx, Yixianosaurus, Dilong, Pedopenna, Jinfengopteryx, Sinocalliopteryx, Sinornis, Ambiortus, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis Every home should have the Discovery Channel http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7848E22F140FE7DF$

Debate Evolution Intelligent Design 5of8