@profjeffreykaplan
  @profjeffreykaplan
Jeffrey Kaplan | David Hume's Argument Against Moral Realism @profjeffreykaplan | Uploaded February 2020 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
I am writing a book! If you want to know when it is ready (and maybe win a free copy), submit your email on my website: jeffreykaplan.org
I won’t spam you or share your email address with anyone.

This is a lecture video about a short selection from book 3 of David Hume's famous work of philosophy, A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40). Hume was an empiricist. The lecture of basically a presentation of his argument from empiricism to the conclusion that there are no genuine, objective moral facts residing in actions themselves (rather, there are only sentiments of moral disapprobation or disapproval in us). This lecture of part of Introduction to Ethics.
David Humes Argument Against Moral RealismThe Zombie Argument (from David Chalmers)Hart - Concept of Law - Ch 3 (Attack on Austins Theory #1)Hart - Concept of Law - Ch 5 (Primary and Secondary Rules)How to Read PhilosophyProper Names by John SearleThe Compositionality of Language explainedMoral Skepticism and Moral ObjectivismIs Pleasure the Only Good Thing? - Nozicks Experience Machine Thought ExperimentWhat is it Like to be a Bat? - the hard problem of consciousnessLecture on Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘Genealogy of Morals’René Descartes - Meditation #2 - I think, therefore, I am

David Hume's Argument Against Moral Realism @profjeffreykaplan

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER