Dating Human Fossils: Totally Inconsistent @MoveToAssurance
Dating Human Fossils: Totally Inconsistent  @MoveToAssurance
Uploaded January 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Different Dating Methods - Different Results

In 1969 the fossil Mungo Woman was dated, using Carbon 14, at about 27,000 years old. In 1998 the Mungo Woman sediment layer was dated using thermoluminescence. The new age? 42,000 years, 16,000 more than the C14 date. Are you starting to see the problem? Thermoluminescence has a lot of problems, such as not knowing the amount of radiation originally ‘stored’ in the mineral. It's not reliable.
For more information and links to our related web pages and videos, go to: SciencePastor.com/mungo2

For other videos in this series go to the "SMITHSONIAN Human Origins" playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7PNIVQ6BfLi-0jo9tbDf9Rj5CsVVMxh9

To subscribe to our YouTube channel click here: youtube.com/channel/UCGSM19Qz1hgwLCZFhiPI3OQ?view_as=subscriber?sub_confirmation=1

Image of Mungo Lake in video is by: dfinnecy - commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mungo_lake_1.jpg
Image of the Skull in video is by: Didier Descouens - commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TC3%A9viec_Crane_Profil_Droit_II.jpg
Dating Human Fossils: Totally InconsistentNatural Selection Has No PowerThe Changing Definition of EvolutionWhy Do We Put Apes in Zoos, But Not Humans?Do Spiral Galaxies Reveal A Young Universe?There Is An Infection In The ChurchRadio Dating Fails Calibration Tests - (Failure Part 2)Did Christianity Hinder Science? - Science Pastor #002Marine Fossils: Evidence Left By The A Global FloodEvolution Is Impossible Part 1 - Science Pastor #007Is there a difference between humans and apes?Do Babies Go To Heaven?
Science Pastor - Move To Assurance |

Dating Human Fossils: Totally Inconsistent

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER