Darwins Greatest Hits | Darth Dawkins refuted by Greg Bahnsen @DarwinsGreatestHits | Uploaded May 2018 | Updated October 2024, 18 hours ago.
Edit 6/2: There is a nuance to Plantinga's view that I learned. Plantinga thinks you can run epistemically circular arguments as long as you don't have doubts about R. The quoted passage in WTCRL doesn't make that clear. I think he follows Alston on this. Alston and Plantinga are both externalists. The main problem is that the epistemically circular argument towards proving R is couched as a conditional, which mean you say something like, "if I have R then I can show that I have R." For more details see http://www.iep.utm.edu/ep-circ/
originals:
youtube.com/watch?v=IiZosY1JqEg
youtube.com/watch?v=wfTYFl-Xl_Q
Edit 6/2: There is a nuance to Plantinga's view that I learned. Plantinga thinks you can run epistemically circular arguments as long as you don't have doubts about R. The quoted passage in WTCRL doesn't make that clear. I think he follows Alston on this. Alston and Plantinga are both externalists. The main problem is that the epistemically circular argument towards proving R is couched as a conditional, which mean you say something like, "if I have R then I can show that I have R." For more details see http://www.iep.utm.edu/ep-circ/
originals:
youtube.com/watch?v=IiZosY1JqEg
youtube.com/watch?v=wfTYFl-Xl_Q
