Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
D4vd’s defense questioned whether the autopsy could determine who was holding the sharp object that caused Celeste Rivas’ fatal injuries — and whether she could have been holding it herself.
In this video, I break down Day 4 of the preliminary hearing, including Dr. Grant Ho’s homicide classification, testimony about the penetrating wounds, the defense’s self-inflicted injury argument, hesitation marks, the dismemberment evidence, toxicology findings and the limits of what the autopsy could establish.
This video covers courtroom testimony and allegations presented during the hearing. D4vd has pleaded not guilty, and the claims discussed have not been proven at trial.
Connect with me:
► Instagram: instagram.com/iamblackyspeakz
► Twitter: twitter.com/BlackySpeakz
D4vd’s defense questioned whether the autopsy could determine who was holding the sharp object that caused Celeste Rivas’ fatal injuries — and whether she could have been holding it herself.
In this video, I break down Day 4 of the preliminary hearing, including Dr. Grant Ho’s homicide classification, testimony about the penetrating wounds, the defense’s self-inflicted injury argument, hesitation marks, the dismemberment evidence, toxicology findings and the limits of what the autopsy could establish.
This video covers courtroom testimony and allegations presented during the hearing. D4vd has pleaded not guilty, and the claims discussed have not been proven at trial.
Connect with me:
► Instagram: instagram.com/iamblackyspeakz
► Twitter: twitter.com/BlackySpeakz
