Countering NIST’s dangerous legal arguments — and preposterous technical arguments @ae911truthvideos
Countering NIST’s dangerous legal arguments — and preposterous technical arguments @ae911truthvideos
AE911Truth | Countering NIST’s dangerous legal arguments — and preposterous technical arguments @ae911truthvideos | Uploaded April 2022 | Updated October 2024, 16 hours ago.
This week on 9/11 Free Fall, attorney Mick Harrison and AE911Truth Director of Strategy Ted Walter join host Andy Steele to discuss the latest developments in AE911Truth’s lawsuit against NIST regarding its report on Building 7.

Earlier this week, AE911Truth and several 9/11 family members filed a response to NIST’s motion to dismiss, rebutting NIST’s dangerous legal arguments that the plaintiffs have no standing and that the public does not have a right to truthful information in statutorily mandated government reports.

For more information, visit AE911Truth.org/NIST.
Countering NIST’s dangerous legal arguments — and preposterous technical argumentsStructural Engineer Roland Angle, P.E., delivers WTC FACTS: Towers 1 & 2Architect Andrew Salter on waking up to controlled demolition after living 9/11Why Is 9/11 Still Important to You? | Give Your Answer BelowProject Due Diligence: The Engineering Community Was Sold Out on 9/11 — Help Us Fight Back!He escaped, and now he won’t be silenced | 9/11 Free Fall9/11: An Architects Guide - Part 2 - Twin Towers Explosive Destruction (12-10-20) Webinar - Gage)9/11: An Architects Guide - Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat (10/22/20 Webinar - R Gage)9/11: An Architects Guide - Part 2 - Twin Towers Explosive Destruction (2/11/21) Webinar - Gage)Dylan Avery Films Thirty Seconds of SilenceGene Johnson brings the WTC 7 evidence to the ASCE’s grassroots/11: An Architects Guide - Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat (1/28/21 Webinar - R Gage)

Countering NIST’s dangerous legal arguments — and preposterous technical arguments @ae911truthvideos

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER