Uploaded February 2018 | Updated September 2026, 39 minutes ago
Conditional probability example problems, pitched at a level appropriate for a typical introductory statistics course. I assume that viewers have already been introduced to the concepts of conditional probability and independence, but I do review the concepts along the way. I work through some problems with the conditional probability formula explicitly, and some using the reduced sample space argument.
The sudden death data is slightly modified from:
Naneix et al. (2015). Sudden adult death: An autopsy series of 534 cases with gender and control comparison. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 32:10-15.
The data was pulled from their Figure 3, and I pooled the Abdominal/pelvian and undetermined groups into "other", to make the example work better visually and have it be easier to follow. I took some slight liberties here, as "undetermined" is not the same as "other". Conscious choice, y'all.
Examples:
0:58. An example using the conditional probability formula, where we are given P(A), P(B), and P(A U B).
3:06: Die rolling. Everybody's fave. P(AUB|C).
4:51. Two-way table, involving real data from above. Limited on interpretation, and focussing on finding various conditional probabilities.
8:05. Conditional probability involving 3 events, visualized with a Venn diagram. P(A n C | B n C), P(B^c|A U C).
11:21. Example of determining whether P(A|B) = P(A), P(A|B) is less than P(A), or P(A|B) is greater than P(A), based on common knowledge and without being given probabilities.
13:00. Informal illustration that if P(A|B) is greater than P(A) then P(B|A) is greater than P(B), and if P(A|B) is less than P(A) then P(B|A) is less than P(B).
14:40. If A is a subset of B, and P(A) is greater than 0, what can be said of P(A|B) and P(B|A)?
Conditional probability example problems, pitched at a level appropriate for a typical introductory statistics course. I assume that viewers have already been introduced to the concepts of conditional probability and independence, but I do review the concepts along the way. I work through some problems with the conditional probability formula explicitly, and some using the reduced sample space argument.
The sudden death data is slightly modified from:
Naneix et al. (2015). Sudden adult death: An autopsy series of 534 cases with gender and control comparison. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 32:10-15.
The data was pulled from their Figure 3, and I pooled the Abdominal/pelvian and undetermined groups into "other", to make the example work better visually and have it be easier to follow. I took some slight liberties here, as "undetermined" is not the same as "other". Conscious choice, y'all.
Examples:
0:58. An example using the conditional probability formula, where we are given P(A), P(B), and P(A U B).
3:06: Die rolling. Everybody's fave. P(AUB|C).
4:51. Two-way table, involving real data from above. Limited on interpretation, and focussing on finding various conditional probabilities.
8:05. Conditional probability involving 3 events, visualized with a Venn diagram. P(A n C | B n C), P(B^c|A U C).
11:21. Example of determining whether P(A|B) = P(A), P(A|B) is less than P(A), or P(A|B) is greater than P(A), based on common knowledge and without being given probabilities.
13:00. Informal illustration that if P(A|B) is greater than P(A) then P(B|A) is greater than P(B), and if P(A|B) is less than P(A) then P(B|A) is less than P(B).
14:40. If A is a subset of B, and P(A) is greater than 0, what can be said of P(A|B) and P(B|A)?




![On average, what proportion of sample means would a randomly selected 95% CI for mu capture?
This ones inspired by a common confidence interval misinterpretation.
(This is a bit of a different video for me, and if youre just looking for help with specific topics in a statistics course, you may not find it helpful. But theres some good stuff in here.)
Here I address what might seem at first like bit of a strange or uninformative question: In repeated sampling from a normally distributed population, on average what proportion of sample means would a randomly selected 95% CI for mu capture? I work through the calculations, then I discuss how this notion relates to bad confidence interval interpretations and reproducibility* studies.
This was inspired by a bad confidence interval interpretation that I heard a number of years ago (and have heard variants of ever since), where, when interpreting a 95% confidence interval for the population mean, the individual stated:
``If you repeat the same study a million times, then the mean of each one of those samples should fall in the interval 95% of the time. [Edited slightly to improve the readability.]
This is a poor interpretation of the interval, and simply untrue. Its just not the case. So, then, what is the probability a randomly selected 95% confidence interval for mu captures the mean of another sample of the same size from the same population?
This has applications in reproducibility* studies, and I briefly discuss that after working through the calculations. My discussion is not intended to be a complete discussion of issues in reproducibility*, just a brief discussion of how the question I answer relates.
*In this video I use reproducible and replicable interchangeably. I know there has been much discussion in some circles of differences between those terms. Apologies if you find my casual use of these terms problematic or misleading.
Reference for the paper I bring up:
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. textit{Science}, 349(6251), 1 8.
Reference for a different discussion about how there is extra variability when comparing two statistics, and why the results found in the reference above might not be as bad as they appear at first blush:
Patil P., Peng R. D., Leek J. T. (2016). What should researchers expect when they replicate studies? A statistical view of replicability in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11 539 544. 10.1177/1745691616646366 On average, what proportion of sample means would a randomly selected 95% CI for mu capture?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GFT-2tY_6I0/mqdefault.jpg)





