No Avail | Concerning Europe: Serviceable Births & Strange Bedfellows @No_Avail | Uploaded July 2017 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
1. Quilliam: quilliaminternational.com
1.2. It is impossible to be prejudiced along these lines: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxastic_attitudes
1.3. To evaluate beliefs is to ascribe better/worse statuses to dissimilar worldviews. This entails having a cerebrally postjudiced [deliberately unprejudiced] evaluative attitude toward beliefs (read: not tribes). With that in mind:
2. Disconcerting data regarding the beliefs of European Muslims: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/19/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe
2.1. Unabridged version: icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Mulims-full-suite-data-plus-topline.pdf
Methodology for 2.1: icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Survey-of-Muslims_Sampling-approach.pdf
Nobie Quilliam = Swimming against the current. A mighty current.
Keyword search "Social Conservatism" to track some of the core issues I referenced in the video. Starting on page 593 [of 615].
Page 596 [of 615] reveals a dizzying 52% net disagreement with the benign statement "Homosexuality should be legal in Britain". Compare this to the 11% net disagreement within the paralleling Control Group Survey. The Muslims Survey shows a paltry 18% net agreement with the same statement, whereas the Control Group Survey produced a weighty 73% net agreement with the same.
Page 601 contains the statement "Jewish people have too much power in Britain" to which the Control Group Survey replies with a reassuringly meager 9% net agreement. The Muslims Survey results in a 35% net agreement. Net disagreement on the same question is 50% according to the Control Group Survey and 20% according to the Muslims Survey.
Similarly worrying disparities with questions/answers pertaining to Jews continue with pages 602, 603, 604 and 605. Perhaps the worst example is the lopsidedness in responses to the statement "Jews are responsible for most of the world's wars". 26% net agreement and 25% net disagreement from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 6% net agreement and 70% net disagreement from the Control Group Survey.
Page 609 poses a question about sympathizing with "Violence organised by groups to protect their own religion". We have 24% net sympathy and 57% net condemnation from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 7% net sympathy and 80% net condemnation from the Control Group Survey.
Page 611 inquires about sympathizing with "Stoning those who commit adultery". We have 5% net sympathy and 79% net condemnation from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 2% net sympathy and 92% net condemnation from the Control Group. These percentages are worth noting when you consider the barbarity behind the question.
Page 612 brings up the oft-discussed Charlie Hebdo attack & inquires if any publication should have the right to publish pictures of the Prophet. Despite everything I've spotlighted so far, these results are perhaps the most damming: Muslims Survey: Only 4% answered "Yes". A whopping 78% answered "No". 12% went with the "It depends on the pictures" copout. 5% went with "I don't know". As for the Control Group Survey: 67% answered "Yes". 20% answered "No". 9% went with "It depends on the pictures". 4% answered "I don't know".
If none of this puts a damper on your misplaced concerns over 'Islamophobia' then I don't know what to tell you. Respond by calling me alt-lite or a crypto-whateverist & I'll respond by calling you an Islamophilia enabler & be done with it. Very productive.
3. Islam continues to be the fastest growing religion: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group
3.1. Historical context: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_of_Islam
Compare:
A: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth
B: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline
3.2. With map: brilliantmaps.com/fertility-rates
3.3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate
3.4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe#Projections
3.5. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Islam
Takeaway: Indoctrination works. Indoctrination is power.
And so: Islamic vs. Kaffir Natalism. Pick your poison.
Throwing tantrums over this merely postpones the inevitable. Just pick it [Western Natalism]. The sooner the better.
Other items mentioned in the video:
Dumb: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocentrism
Dumber: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biocentrism_(ethics)
Dumbest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecocentrism
Not dumb: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
Spot on: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism#Gradualism
Dumb again: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology
New dumbest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_philosophy
To abridge: Despite modernity, religio-parental indoctrination continues to get the job done across the Muslim world & in other similarly conformist, intellectually unfree regions. It works persistently. Don't make that problem worse.
1. Quilliam: quilliaminternational.com
1.2. It is impossible to be prejudiced along these lines: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxastic_attitudes
1.3. To evaluate beliefs is to ascribe better/worse statuses to dissimilar worldviews. This entails having a cerebrally postjudiced [deliberately unprejudiced] evaluative attitude toward beliefs (read: not tribes). With that in mind:
2. Disconcerting data regarding the beliefs of European Muslims: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/19/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe
2.1. Unabridged version: icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Mulims-full-suite-data-plus-topline.pdf
Methodology for 2.1: icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Survey-of-Muslims_Sampling-approach.pdf
Nobie Quilliam = Swimming against the current. A mighty current.
Keyword search "Social Conservatism" to track some of the core issues I referenced in the video. Starting on page 593 [of 615].
Page 596 [of 615] reveals a dizzying 52% net disagreement with the benign statement "Homosexuality should be legal in Britain". Compare this to the 11% net disagreement within the paralleling Control Group Survey. The Muslims Survey shows a paltry 18% net agreement with the same statement, whereas the Control Group Survey produced a weighty 73% net agreement with the same.
Page 601 contains the statement "Jewish people have too much power in Britain" to which the Control Group Survey replies with a reassuringly meager 9% net agreement. The Muslims Survey results in a 35% net agreement. Net disagreement on the same question is 50% according to the Control Group Survey and 20% according to the Muslims Survey.
Similarly worrying disparities with questions/answers pertaining to Jews continue with pages 602, 603, 604 and 605. Perhaps the worst example is the lopsidedness in responses to the statement "Jews are responsible for most of the world's wars". 26% net agreement and 25% net disagreement from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 6% net agreement and 70% net disagreement from the Control Group Survey.
Page 609 poses a question about sympathizing with "Violence organised by groups to protect their own religion". We have 24% net sympathy and 57% net condemnation from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 7% net sympathy and 80% net condemnation from the Control Group Survey.
Page 611 inquires about sympathizing with "Stoning those who commit adultery". We have 5% net sympathy and 79% net condemnation from the Muslims Survey. Compare with 2% net sympathy and 92% net condemnation from the Control Group. These percentages are worth noting when you consider the barbarity behind the question.
Page 612 brings up the oft-discussed Charlie Hebdo attack & inquires if any publication should have the right to publish pictures of the Prophet. Despite everything I've spotlighted so far, these results are perhaps the most damming: Muslims Survey: Only 4% answered "Yes". A whopping 78% answered "No". 12% went with the "It depends on the pictures" copout. 5% went with "I don't know". As for the Control Group Survey: 67% answered "Yes". 20% answered "No". 9% went with "It depends on the pictures". 4% answered "I don't know".
If none of this puts a damper on your misplaced concerns over 'Islamophobia' then I don't know what to tell you. Respond by calling me alt-lite or a crypto-whateverist & I'll respond by calling you an Islamophilia enabler & be done with it. Very productive.
3. Islam continues to be the fastest growing religion: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group
3.1. Historical context: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_of_Islam
Compare:
A: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth
B: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline
3.2. With map: brilliantmaps.com/fertility-rates
3.3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate
3.4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe#Projections
3.5. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Islam
Takeaway: Indoctrination works. Indoctrination is power.
And so: Islamic vs. Kaffir Natalism. Pick your poison.
Throwing tantrums over this merely postpones the inevitable. Just pick it [Western Natalism]. The sooner the better.
Other items mentioned in the video:
Dumb: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocentrism
Dumber: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biocentrism_(ethics)
Dumbest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecocentrism
Not dumb: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
Spot on: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism#Gradualism
Dumb again: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology
New dumbest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_philosophy
To abridge: Despite modernity, religio-parental indoctrination continues to get the job done across the Muslim world & in other similarly conformist, intellectually unfree regions. It works persistently. Don't make that problem worse.
