Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
JOIN THE MEMBERSHIP: armedattorneys.com/memberships
Survival is step one. We're step two.
Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Emily Taylor discuss a major Texas Supreme Court case that could have significant implications for firearm rights and protective orders in Texas.
For the first time in nearly a century, the Texas Supreme Court has weighed in on the intersection of protective orders, the right to keep and bear arms, and constitutional protections under both the Second Amendment and the Texas Constitution.
In Noyes v. State, the Court reviewed a case involving allegations of stalking, harassment, and a lifetime firearm prohibition imposed through a protective order. While the Court did not decide the ultimate constitutional question, it vacated the lower court's ruling and ordered further review in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Rahimi.
The case raises important questions:
• Can Texas impose a lifetime firearm ban through a protective order?• How does Rahimi affect firearm restrictions on individuals subject to protective orders?• What protections does Article I, Section 23 of the Texas Constitution provide?• Did the Founding Era allow governments to disarm dangerous individuals?• Is there a constitutional difference between temporary and lifetime firearm prohibitions?• Why are some Texas Supreme Court justices expressing skepticism toward permanent disarmament?
We break down the Court's opinion, the powerful concurrence, and why this may become one of the most important Texas gun-rights cases to watch in the coming years.
\\📌 Get the Armed Attorneys Insider Newsletter!\👉 https://mailchi.mp/armedattorneys/insider
⚖️ Need a Texas Criminal Lawyer?Walker & Taylor, PLLC – walkertaylorlaw.com
🎯 SUPPORT THE ARMED ATTORNEYS!✔️ Join our YouTube Community: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join✔️ Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys✔️ Merch Store: armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/✔️ Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys✔️ Visit our website: armedattorneys.com
Legal Disclaimers:
📌 General Information OnlyThe material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. Always consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.
📌 All Rights ReservedThis material is the sole property of Armed Attorneys, LLC. No reproduction is permitted without written permission, except for brief quotations in reviews or critical articles.
Armed Attorneys, LLC is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal representation. Legal services are provided solely by licensed attorneys approved or contracted by Armed Attorneys, LLC.
#Texas #SecondAmendment #GunRights #TexasSupremeCourt #Rahimi #ProtectiveOrders #FirearmsLaw #ArmedAttorneys
JOIN THE MEMBERSHIP: armedattorneys.com/memberships
Survival is step one. We're step two.
Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Emily Taylor discuss a major Texas Supreme Court case that could have significant implications for firearm rights and protective orders in Texas.
For the first time in nearly a century, the Texas Supreme Court has weighed in on the intersection of protective orders, the right to keep and bear arms, and constitutional protections under both the Second Amendment and the Texas Constitution.
In Noyes v. State, the Court reviewed a case involving allegations of stalking, harassment, and a lifetime firearm prohibition imposed through a protective order. While the Court did not decide the ultimate constitutional question, it vacated the lower court's ruling and ordered further review in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Rahimi.
The case raises important questions:
• Can Texas impose a lifetime firearm ban through a protective order?• How does Rahimi affect firearm restrictions on individuals subject to protective orders?• What protections does Article I, Section 23 of the Texas Constitution provide?• Did the Founding Era allow governments to disarm dangerous individuals?• Is there a constitutional difference between temporary and lifetime firearm prohibitions?• Why are some Texas Supreme Court justices expressing skepticism toward permanent disarmament?
We break down the Court's opinion, the powerful concurrence, and why this may become one of the most important Texas gun-rights cases to watch in the coming years.
\\📌 Get the Armed Attorneys Insider Newsletter!\👉 https://mailchi.mp/armedattorneys/insider
⚖️ Need a Texas Criminal Lawyer?Walker & Taylor, PLLC – walkertaylorlaw.com
🎯 SUPPORT THE ARMED ATTORNEYS!✔️ Join our YouTube Community: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join✔️ Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys✔️ Merch Store: armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/✔️ Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys✔️ Visit our website: armedattorneys.com
Legal Disclaimers:
📌 General Information OnlyThe material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. Always consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.
📌 All Rights ReservedThis material is the sole property of Armed Attorneys, LLC. No reproduction is permitted without written permission, except for brief quotations in reviews or critical articles.
Armed Attorneys, LLC is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal representation. Legal services are provided solely by licensed attorneys approved or contracted by Armed Attorneys, LLC.
#Texas #SecondAmendment #GunRights #TexasSupremeCourt #Rahimi #ProtectiveOrders #FirearmsLaw #ArmedAttorneys
