Uploaded February 2017 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
Australian economist Alan Moran says that the UN's attempts to mitigate the non problem of 'global warming' through CO2 abatement are likely to lead to centralized control and economic disaster.
Editor of the popular book, Climate Change: The Facts, Moran was a speaker at the 10th Annual Conference on Climate Change hosted by the Heartland Institute (Washington DC, June 11-12, 2015). "The cost could be quite colossal. Just think in terms of totally scrapping all our different power stations - finding ways of producing steel without using coal; finding ways of producing plastics; what will we do about airlines? These are profound questions that really aren't answered at all - by the IPCC or the other warmest literature." Moran, PhD, economics, concludes: "Global warming may not be happening. If it is happening it is not very severe and to try do do something about it will be extremely expensive. It will mean a total revolution of the world's economy and it will mean almost a centralized control over the world's economy which is a) unpalatable and b) likely to lead to an economic disaster." yoryevrah
Australian economist Alan Moran says that the UN's attempts to mitigate the non problem of 'global warming' through CO2 abatement are likely to lead to centralized control and economic disaster.
Editor of the popular book, Climate Change: The Facts, Moran was a speaker at the 10th Annual Conference on Climate Change hosted by the Heartland Institute (Washington DC, June 11-12, 2015). "The cost could be quite colossal. Just think in terms of totally scrapping all our different power stations - finding ways of producing steel without using coal; finding ways of producing plastics; what will we do about airlines? These are profound questions that really aren't answered at all - by the IPCC or the other warmest literature." Moran, PhD, economics, concludes: "Global warming may not be happening. If it is happening it is not very severe and to try do do something about it will be extremely expensive. It will mean a total revolution of the world's economy and it will mean almost a centralized control over the world's economy which is a) unpalatable and b) likely to lead to an economic disaster." yoryevrah
![KILL EVERYBODY: American soldier exposes US policy in Iraq
KILL EVERYBODY - US ARMY SPECIALIST DARRELL ANDERSON EXPOSES US POLICY I joined in 03, cause I was broke, I needed money, but I was a young American kid, I wanted to fight in a war. I joined up. [A] month out of training I arrived in Baghdad, Iraq, January 04. Saddams been captured. And I get there and the guys Im serving with have been there for six months already; they were there in 03. And I go, Well, you know what, I think its come out that, you know, these people had nothing to do with 9/11, there was no Iraqi on those planes. We can see around here theres no Al Qaida, theres no terrorist syndicates in Baghdad, or Iraq. Saddam had stamped em out.
And I asked my buddies, Well, you know, were here to find weapons of mass destruction. And they laughed at me. And I said, Well, you know, were here to help the people. And they laughed at me. And I said, Whats our mission? Whats our goal?...Theyre like, All were trying to do is make it home alive...
Anderson describes the escalation of violence against unarmed civilians: In April, they told us, In a crowded area, if one person shoots at you, kill everybody. Anderson explains the rationale from the officers: They [members of the crowd of people] are letting them [the person or persons firing at the U.S. military] attack you. Theyre no longer innocent if theyre there at the time of the crime... (9/11 conference, Chandler AZ Feb 23-25, 2007) 911TV.org / snowshoefilms post-production yoryevrah
Some relevant background:
In trying to suppress the Yugoslavian resistance, Nazi Gen. Keitel, supreme commander of the armed forces, issued this order in Sept. 1941:
In order to nip disorders in the bud the sternest measures must be applied at the first sign of insurrection. It should also be taken into consideration that in the countries in question a human life is often valueless. In a reprisal for the life of a German soldier, the general rule should be capital punishment for 50-100 Communists. The manner of execution must have a frightening effect.
Perhaps the American generals, the neo-cons, and the new world order planners who direct them are copying the Nazi (or Stalinist) playbook. More likely, though, they are progressing along parallel lines because theyve committed the same egregious war crimes; they can only compound their crimes until they kill everybody who resists them. The Yugoslavian partisans fighting German fascism were called communists. Today, US fascism calls that same resistance in Iraq and Afghanistan terrorist. Gen. Keitel was hanged for this and other war crimes by the Nuremberg Tribunal on October 16, 1946. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/resistance_movement_in_yugoslavi.htm
After 7 months in Iraq, Darrell Anderson, 22, decided that he wasnt to risk going back to Iraq to kill or be killed. He fled to Canada, a deserter. While there, though, he felt he wasnt doing enough to expose and stop the war and returned to U.S. and, possibly, a long prison sentence. Perhaps to undermine the legal case of other deserters in Canada, the U.S. military imprisoned Anderson only a few days, releasing him with a less than honorable discharge. Given Andersons heroic determination to organize and help GI and other war resisters, the U.S. military may come to believe theyve made a mistake. 911TV.org / www.SNOWSHOEFILMS.COM yoryevrah
Yortevrah updates: PSDplat asks, wtf does he [Darrel Anderson] mean, expose 911? Good question. Anderson, gung-ho when he got to Iraq, quickly learned that Saddam had nothing to do with Sept. 11. It takes a while longer to come to grips with the deeper lie that 9/11 was an inside job. Defenders of the official conspiracy theory (19 Arab hijackers) enable the inside-job perpetrators to get away with their crimes and cover-up and to continue the mother of all hate crimes, the racist, genocidal, global and ersatz war on terror.
One indication that a persons belief system (cognition) is unsound and unstable (and manipulated) is his use of ad hominem attacks (name calling) in a desperate attempt to repress an impinged perspective. CereaLVII, for example, indicates he himself is in a high state of cognitive dissonance (denial). If his belief system was secure he wouldnt be provoked into calling Darrell Anderson a pussy, and so forth. KILL EVERYBODY: American soldier exposes US policy in Iraq](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VwwMF6biCJU/mqdefault.jpg)







![Hidden History of 9-11: Zarembka
THERES NO THERE THERE, IN THE PARALLEL UNIVERSE: Philip Zelikow
Snowshoefilms interviews Prof. Paul Zarembka (SUNY, Buffalo) on the launching of his book, The Hidden History of 9-11. The book is an updated, inexpensive 2nd edition of the 2006 Dutch version (Elsiever) which was priced at $85. Seven Stories taking on the Zarembka book marks the first time a major independent progressive publisher in the U.S. has touched 9-11 critically.
Further, it was Seven Stories that published the blockbuster Noam Chomsky book, 9-11, in early 2002, that famously accepts the official story, hyping blowback. Zarembkas book features chapters by Jay Kolar, David Ray Griffin, Four Arrows (aka Don Trent Jacobs), Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed, David MacGreggor, Bryan Sacks, Diana Ralph and Zarembka. Plus a very timely update by Kevin Ryan who was fired from UL Labs for his criticism of the first NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) report. Video includes footage of Prof Zarembkas question to Philip Zelikow, executive director and author of the 9/11 Official Report. Zelikow responds with creative ad hominum (parallel universes) and dismissal (there is no there there, i.e., nothing to it)...
On August 21, 2008, NIST released its purported FINAL REPORT on WTC 7, the 47-story steel skyscraper that collapsed at near freefall speed around 5:20 pm, Sept 11, 2001.
Zelikows 9/11 cover-up commission report didnt even bother to mention Building 7.
The New York Times (Aug. 22, 2008): FIRE LED 3rd TOWER TO COLLAPSE ON 9/11.
The lead investigator for the NIST report is Dr. S. Shyam Sunder. At an Aug. 21, 2008 press conference, he said, The collapse of the World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery...It did not collapse from explosives or fuel oil fires.
The NYT writes, His [Sunders] investigators determined that the fire on that day was fed by OFFICE PAPER AND FURNISHINGS.
It all started when a girder on the on the 13th floor, wouldnt you know, broke loose from Critical Column 79. When Critical Column 79 gave way, all the floors below it down the the 5th gave way, then all the floors above it (the 13th) gave way all the way up to the roof.
It was standing there in air, and poof, it just burned up in about 7 seconds.
Dr Sunder says, The physics is consistent, it is sound, it has been analyzed.
As Zelikow says, there is no there. Move along. Nothing to look at. Paralogic compliance, go back to your trance state.
Perhaps Sunder, like Zelikow, will get invited to the next Bilderberg meeting.
Paul Zarembka, editor of Hidden History of 9-11, teaches economics at the State University of New York, Buffalo.
Yoryevrah nerak snowshoefilms
(apologies to those whose comments on the initial posting were deleted, along with the vid, which had a couple of glitches). Hidden History of 9-11: Zarembka](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XOKDlUoeQHI/mqdefault.jpg)

