Christ + Our Part? - A Review and Refutation of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch Sheets @CICministry
Christ + Our Part? - A Review and Refutation of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch Sheets  @CICministry
Uploaded September 2022 | Updated September 2026, 3 hours ago
Dutch Sheets claims, in reference to Colossians 1:24, that what is missing is our part – “the mediating, the going between, the distributing, the enforcing,” (p. 77). We show that this is a denial of sufficiency of Christ. Our job is to proclaim what He has done, not add to it.

This is a critique of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch Sheets, Bethany House, 1996.
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.

Recovering Reformation Theology - Rejecting Synergism and Returning to Monergism
cicministry.org/commentary/issue93.htm
Christ + Our Part? - A Review and Refutation of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch SheetsThe Danger of Spiritual ElitismWhen Biblical Truth is no Longer Worth Fighting ForThe Desires of the People Must Not Determine the Churchs MessageThe Social Gospel RepackagedSubjective Feelings or Objective Truth?The Range of Meaning FallacyContrived Process of Spiritual FormationA Review of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch Sheets, Part 37 – Salvation Comes through the GospelThe Danger of Deserting the Gospel: Galatians 1:6-10, Part 3Beware of Human Philosophy - A Review and Refutation of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch SheetsDefending the Meaning of the Lords Prayer
Critical Issues Commentary |

Christ + Our Part? - A Review and Refutation of Intercessory Prayer by Dutch Sheets

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER