Uploaded October 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
How did Frédéric Chopin play the piano? We can't know for sure, but fortunately we have a lot of information. Some of the elements in Chopin's piano playing are: Rubato, phrasing and legato highly influenced by 19th century Bel Canto (especially from opera singers singing Bellini); playing the right hand as like a vocalist and the left hand as accompaniment (basis of rubato in a nutshell is like this); full legato embedded on keyboard; dynamics were multi-scale, unique feathery pianissimo were most common but he also rarely used very very powerful fortissimo touches (depending on the concept of "zal", the feeling of rebellion was also included in some of his works); natural and colorful timbre; very lively sense of spontaneous (he always played his works differently); infrequent but very effective pedal use; touch control giving polyphonic line (one of his favorite composers was Bach); controlled but also rhythmically free and sophisticated (Polish rhythms are particularly effective); a very nuanced, refined and fluid approach, complexity and simplicity combined; ornament that does not disturb the structure of the work (may be called "Mozartian ornament"); he was an aristocrat so he did not like very exaggerated attitudes, of course by romantic era standards.
The emotion and passionate was intense but not identical (He said that his playing changes depending on his mood). Today, "sad" Chopin is common, but in reality Chopin's emotion was all kinds: Sometimes it sounded volcanic, sometimes joyful, sometimes sickly.
It contained many elements that seemed to contradict each other. That's why Chopin's piano playing is highly controversial. It was very difficult to imitate or imagine.
We can hear these in pianists indirectly related to Chopin. I think, these recordings can give an idea of how Chopin played.
00:00 Moriz Rosenthal - Sonata No. 3, Largo (incomplete take, 1939?)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli (Who had been Chopin's pupil and assistant) and Franz Liszt (Chopin's close friend)
04:00 Alexander Michalowski - Etude Op. 10, No 11 (R. 1912)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli and Princess Marcelina Czartoryska (Who had been Chopin's pupil). He also met with Liszt and some other Chopin students.
06:48 Vladimir de Pachmann - Barcarolle (abridged, R. 1907)
Pupil of Mme. Vera Kologrivoff Rubio (Who had been Chopin’s pupil and last assistant) and close friend of Liszt.
11:28 Alfred Cortot - Prelude Op. 28, No. 17, A-flat major (R. 1933)
Pupil of Émile Decombes (He was one of the last pupils of Frédéric Chopin) and he listened to George Mathias (one of Chopin's best pupils), he is one of Cortot's Chopin inspiration.
14:07 Raoul Koczalski - Fantaise-Impromptu in C-Sharp Major, Op. 66 (On Chopin's Pleyel, R. 1948)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli.
18:46 Raoul Pugno - Nocturne in F-Sharp Major, Op. 15 No. 2 (R. 1903)
Pupil of Georges Mathias.
22:13 Édouard Risler - Waltz No. 7 in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 64, No. 2 (R. 1917)
Pupil of Émile Decombes.
How did Frédéric Chopin play the piano? We can't know for sure, but fortunately we have a lot of information. Some of the elements in Chopin's piano playing are: Rubato, phrasing and legato highly influenced by 19th century Bel Canto (especially from opera singers singing Bellini); playing the right hand as like a vocalist and the left hand as accompaniment (basis of rubato in a nutshell is like this); full legato embedded on keyboard; dynamics were multi-scale, unique feathery pianissimo were most common but he also rarely used very very powerful fortissimo touches (depending on the concept of "zal", the feeling of rebellion was also included in some of his works); natural and colorful timbre; very lively sense of spontaneous (he always played his works differently); infrequent but very effective pedal use; touch control giving polyphonic line (one of his favorite composers was Bach); controlled but also rhythmically free and sophisticated (Polish rhythms are particularly effective); a very nuanced, refined and fluid approach, complexity and simplicity combined; ornament that does not disturb the structure of the work (may be called "Mozartian ornament"); he was an aristocrat so he did not like very exaggerated attitudes, of course by romantic era standards.
The emotion and passionate was intense but not identical (He said that his playing changes depending on his mood). Today, "sad" Chopin is common, but in reality Chopin's emotion was all kinds: Sometimes it sounded volcanic, sometimes joyful, sometimes sickly.
It contained many elements that seemed to contradict each other. That's why Chopin's piano playing is highly controversial. It was very difficult to imitate or imagine.
We can hear these in pianists indirectly related to Chopin. I think, these recordings can give an idea of how Chopin played.
00:00 Moriz Rosenthal - Sonata No. 3, Largo (incomplete take, 1939?)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli (Who had been Chopin's pupil and assistant) and Franz Liszt (Chopin's close friend)
04:00 Alexander Michalowski - Etude Op. 10, No 11 (R. 1912)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli and Princess Marcelina Czartoryska (Who had been Chopin's pupil). He also met with Liszt and some other Chopin students.
06:48 Vladimir de Pachmann - Barcarolle (abridged, R. 1907)
Pupil of Mme. Vera Kologrivoff Rubio (Who had been Chopin’s pupil and last assistant) and close friend of Liszt.
11:28 Alfred Cortot - Prelude Op. 28, No. 17, A-flat major (R. 1933)
Pupil of Émile Decombes (He was one of the last pupils of Frédéric Chopin) and he listened to George Mathias (one of Chopin's best pupils), he is one of Cortot's Chopin inspiration.
14:07 Raoul Koczalski - Fantaise-Impromptu in C-Sharp Major, Op. 66 (On Chopin's Pleyel, R. 1948)
Pupil of Karol Mikuli.
18:46 Raoul Pugno - Nocturne in F-Sharp Major, Op. 15 No. 2 (R. 1903)
Pupil of Georges Mathias.
22:13 Édouard Risler - Waltz No. 7 in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 64, No. 2 (R. 1917)
Pupil of Émile Decombes.








![Claude Debussy and his Friends/Pupils plays Debussy
Claude Debussy is one of the most important pianists and composers of the 20th century. This selection shows how Debussy played the piano, how he wanted his piano works to be interpreted and I tried to explain Debussys piano concept in the information I gave in the video. All the recordings I chose from pianists associated with Debussy.
Debussy was generally dissatisfied with the pianists playing his own works: I assure you one cannot imagine how my music is disfigured; often I can scarcely recognize it. . . . Pianists dissect my music into bits and pieces, like a roast chicken.
Marguerite Long, one of Frances most important pianists and piano pedagogues, would describe Debussys influence on the French Piano School: We never listened to or played the piano after Debussy in the same way as we did before him . . . He was an incomparable pianist. Jacques Durand: A full sonority, a remarkable delicacy, a perfect mastery of nuance, an impeccable finish, an imperceptible rubato always framed within the beat, an astounding use of pedal: all this was what defined Debussys playing.
Debussy said that he had heard only two fine pianists in his lifetime: ... my old piano teacher, a small, fat lady who threw me into Bach and who played him as no one does nowadays, making him live [...]. The second pianist was Liszt, whom I heard in Rome. Debussy was definitely influenced by Chopin and Liszt. His teacher was a student of Chopin. He gave references to Chopin throughout his life and dedicated his Etudes to Chopin. And he had heard of Liszt himself, and Liszts use of pedals especially impressed him.
Even if the understanding of the piano came from Chopin and Liszt, there were serious innovations. First of all, Debussy did not like Bel Canto opera and Chopins pianism had a Bel Canto influence. Debussy removed this Bel Canto and vocal influence on the piano. Secondary, Debussy had a piano approach similar to Liszt, he thought orchestral. But it was not a large orchestra like Liszts. Debussy does not have the percussion piano understanding of Liszt. For Debussy, the piano was a stringed instrument, and the piano was not a miniature orchestra, piano had its own timbre. It was not like a reproduction instrument. He had a knowing of limits perspective like Chopin. Debussy removed other interactions and sought the pianos own character. The piano was not an instrument imitating songs or a miniature instrument imitating all instruments. The piano was a harp and bell-like instrument with a distinctive timbre.
There are no recordings in this selection of pianists like Moriz Rosenthal and Victor Staub, whom Debussy might have liked, because I have no conclusive evidence of any connection to Debussy.
All works belong to Debussy.
00:00 Claude Debussy - Mes longs cheveux descendent
From Pelleas et Melisandre, Rec. 1904
00:26 Elie Robert Schmitz - De pas sur la neige
From Preludes, Livre I, Rec. 1943
03:52 Marcelle Meyer - La terrasse des audiences du claire de lune
From Preludes, Livre II, Rec. 1956
08:01 Daniel Ericourt - Canope
From Preludes, Livre II, Rec. 1960
11:13 George Copeland - Voiles
From Preludes Livre I, Rec. 1933
15:06 Alfred Cortot - The Snow Is Dancing
From Childrens Corner, Rec. 1947
17:39 Marguerite Long - Jardins Sous La Pluie
From Estampes, Rec. 1929
20:40 Marcel Ciampi - Les collines dAnacapri
From Preludes, Livre I, Rec. 1928
23:40 Harold Bauer - Clair de Lune
From Suite Bergamasque, Rec. 1929
28:08 Ignacy Jan Paderewski - Reflets dans leau
From Images, Livre I, Rec. 1926
32:34 Guiomar Novaes - Poissons dor
From Images, Livre II, Rec. 1962
36:15 Ricardo Vines - La soirée dans Grenade
From Estampes, Rec. 1929
I should mention that I obtained some music recordings from channels on YouTube. Schimitzs recording is from Richard Masters, Longs recording is from davidhertzberg, Ciampis recording is from Pianopera, Novaes recording from Instituto Piano Brasileiro - IPB. Claude Debussy and his Friends/Pupils plays Debussy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ui-S76MRxyY/mqdefault.jpg)

