Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 14 hours ago
At this stage, we just have Chille DeCastro's "Notice of Appeal," which is not the appellate brief, as that comes months later. He is asserting an "absolute" right to dismiss Blue Bacon, Team Skeptic and another person without prejudice under CCP 581, but case law (which I provide) says otherwise. He is taking his appeal before the Los Angeles Court of Appeal, where that court just affirmed my dismissal of a multi-million dollar case last month on anti-SLAPP grounds. The Court will follow precedent from its own district (the Second District), so I provided case law that prevents Chille from arguing this point.
Chille figured if he just voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice, he could avoid the impact of terminating sanctions motion. Nope. If that were allowed then any person about to suffer an adverse decision would dismiss before the decision could be rendered against them, and allow them to refile the case again. What Blue Bacon's lawyer wanted was a dismissal with prejudice, and that meant having the trial court strike Chille's request for dismissal. The trial court did that.
I covered other things he'll need to address to. His best argument at this stage is his argument that he was denied the right to counsel. The dates will need to be checked. He was convicted on March 19, 2024 and the appeal overturned on July 10, 2024. Chille got those dates wrong in his declaration, and the declaration was conclusory. Those being paid will need to review if the motions to compel that results in discovery violations and sanctions against Chille were targeting him while he was incarcerated. None of this is legal advice, and you cannot rely upon in any manner. No attorney-client relationship is implied or formed. This video is protected by California's anti-SLAPP statute and other affirmative defenses.
Chille's last day to file an amended notice of appeal ended on November 17th, so I figured I'd wait until November 18th to give my thoughts.
I made a mistake in saying that the April 15, 2025 request for dismissal was covered in the September 17, 2025 order signed by the judge, and saved by the 60 day deadline. Actually, as the minute order shows, that order for terminating sanctions was entered July 3, 2025, and assuming a few things happened as they were supposed to, the appeal on that is untimely.
@dickbagpatrol
@Direct_D
@frauditortroll
@UncleanHands1
@TrollMediaGroup
@andreysloan8347
@BlackHartKnight
@BlackHartKnight
@TeamSkeptic
@BlueBacon
@ncrnewsnetwork
@frauditorram
@FAMILIA-TV
@frauditorfollies
@FrauditorRoundup
@TheNightCap
At this stage, we just have Chille DeCastro's "Notice of Appeal," which is not the appellate brief, as that comes months later. He is asserting an "absolute" right to dismiss Blue Bacon, Team Skeptic and another person without prejudice under CCP 581, but case law (which I provide) says otherwise. He is taking his appeal before the Los Angeles Court of Appeal, where that court just affirmed my dismissal of a multi-million dollar case last month on anti-SLAPP grounds. The Court will follow precedent from its own district (the Second District), so I provided case law that prevents Chille from arguing this point.
Chille figured if he just voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice, he could avoid the impact of terminating sanctions motion. Nope. If that were allowed then any person about to suffer an adverse decision would dismiss before the decision could be rendered against them, and allow them to refile the case again. What Blue Bacon's lawyer wanted was a dismissal with prejudice, and that meant having the trial court strike Chille's request for dismissal. The trial court did that.
I covered other things he'll need to address to. His best argument at this stage is his argument that he was denied the right to counsel. The dates will need to be checked. He was convicted on March 19, 2024 and the appeal overturned on July 10, 2024. Chille got those dates wrong in his declaration, and the declaration was conclusory. Those being paid will need to review if the motions to compel that results in discovery violations and sanctions against Chille were targeting him while he was incarcerated. None of this is legal advice, and you cannot rely upon in any manner. No attorney-client relationship is implied or formed. This video is protected by California's anti-SLAPP statute and other affirmative defenses.
Chille's last day to file an amended notice of appeal ended on November 17th, so I figured I'd wait until November 18th to give my thoughts.
I made a mistake in saying that the April 15, 2025 request for dismissal was covered in the September 17, 2025 order signed by the judge, and saved by the 60 day deadline. Actually, as the minute order shows, that order for terminating sanctions was entered July 3, 2025, and assuming a few things happened as they were supposed to, the appeal on that is untimely.
@dickbagpatrol
@Direct_D
@frauditortroll
@UncleanHands1
@TrollMediaGroup
@andreysloan8347
@BlackHartKnight
@BlackHartKnight
@TeamSkeptic
@BlueBacon
@ncrnewsnetwork
@frauditorram
@FAMILIA-TV
@frauditorfollies
@FrauditorRoundup
@TheNightCap
