Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct @WorldSocionics
Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct  @WorldSocionics
Uploaded December 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Charges do not exist in classical socionics as subdivisions of the IM Elements. The only classical basis for charges is the use of them as emergent properties, e.g. to symbolise the directions of information blocking within the static and dynamic rings, and the benefit and supervision rings, as well as the positivist/negativist and process/result type dichotomies. To say that there is an Se+ or Se- is baseless.

To purchase the most comprehensive Course on Classical Socionics for only £300 GBP, please email worldsocionics@hotmail.com with 'Course' in the email title.

#socionics #modelA #signs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: youtube.com/c/WorldSocionicsSocietyWSS?sub_confirmation=1

Become a Patron: patreon.com/WorldSocionics

Join our Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/worldsocionicssociety

Like our Facebook page: facebook.com/worldsocionicssociety

Check out our Blog: worldsocionics.blogspot.com
Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR CorrectThe Pliability of INFPs5 Signs Youre Not An INTPWSS Interviews Ahmad Ridhwan (ESTP)A Big AnnouncementThe INFJs Desire for HarmonyNew Youtube Channel! Political PersonalitiesIM Element Themes - Explained CorrectlyCelebrity Typing Livestream #23Navigating Relationships as an INFPENTP vs. ESFJ - ILE vs. ESE - Explained CorrectlyFollow up with Sam (ESTJ)
Jack Aaron |

Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER