Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct  @WorldSocionics
Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct  @WorldSocionics
World Socionics Society | Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct @WorldSocionics | Uploaded December 2023 | Updated October 2024, 10 hours ago.
Charges do not exist in classical socionics as subdivisions of the IM Elements. The only classical basis for charges is the use of them as emergent properties, e.g. to symbolise the directions of information blocking within the static and dynamic rings, and the benefit and supervision rings, as well as the positivist/negativist and process/result type dichotomies. To say that there is an Se+ or Se- is baseless.

To purchase the most comprehensive Course on Classical Socionics for only £300 GBP, please email worldsocionics@hotmail.com with 'Course' in the email title.

#socionics #modelA #signs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: youtube.com/c/WorldSocionicsSocietyWSS?sub_confirmation=1

Become a Patron: patreon.com/WorldSocionics

Join our Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/worldsocionicssociety

Like our Facebook page: facebook.com/worldsocionicssociety

Check out our Blog: worldsocionics.blogspot.com
Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR CorrectMotes & Beams with Michael PierceFollow up with Solomon the Surmounter (LIE)WSS Interviews Carmine @CarmineCastiglione (LIE)New Youtube Channel! Political PersonalitiesDebate: Charges, Yay or Nay?Follow up with J. Broady (EIE)Extroverted iNtuition + Extroverted Thinking - Ne + Te - Ideas + Pragmatism - Explained CorrectlyReaction to Binyamin Tsadik on Objective PersonalitySensor vs. iNtuitor - Explained CorrectlyENTP vs. ESFJ - ILE vs. ESE - Explained CorrectlyWSS Interviews Nichole (LII)

Charges are NEITHER Classical NOR Correct @WorldSocionics

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER