Carina Prunkl: Resource theories of thermodynamics and axiomatics: a comparison @rotmanphilosophy
Carina Prunkl: Resource theories of thermodynamics and axiomatics: a comparison  @rotmanphilosophy
Uploaded July 2018 | Updated September 2026, 6 hours ago
The resource theory of non-thermal states provides a lean and powerful framework to calculate the thermal behavior of quantum systems. Some scientists even claim that it has “advanced our understanding of fundamental physical principles, such as the second law of thermodynamics” (del Rio et al., 2015, p.1). It is furthermore said that thermodynamics itself can be derived from resource theoretic considerations, since “the free energy of thermodynamics emerges naturally from the resource theory of energy-preserving transformations” (Brandão et al., 2013, p.1).

Here I want to probe the claim that resource theories provide us with a deeper understanding of thermodynamics. I will do so by comparing them to the axiomatic approaches developed by Carathéodory and by Lieb and Yngvason. At the center of such axiomatic formulations is the concept of adiabatic accessibility. A state is said to be adiabatically accessible from another if the thermodynamic system in question can evolve into it without exchanging heat or matter with the environment. This notion of adiabatic accessibility has a striking resemblance to the order relations encountered in the resource theory of nonuniformity and the resource theory of non-thermal states, each of which define at least one measure on the resource states that is monotonically non-decreasing under the set of allowed transformation. In my talk I will explore similarities and differences between the two approaches and discuss whether resource theories indeed provide us with a deeper insight into thermodynamics.

Annual UWO Philosophy of Physics Conference
Thermodynamics as a Resource Theory: Foundational and Philosophical Implications
June 20-22, 2018
philphysics.uwo.ca
Carina Prunkl, University of Oxford

Visit the Rotman website for more information on applications, events, project descriptions, and openings. rotman.uwo.ca

Follow The Rotman Institute on Twitter: twitter.com/rotmanphilo

Like The Rotman Institute on Facebook: facebook.com/rotmanphilosophy

Subscribe to our channel: youtube.com/user/rotmanphilosophy
Carina Prunkl: Resource theories of thermodynamics and axiomatics: a comparisonMolly Kao: Blind analysis as coherence testingTracy Isaacs: Individual and Collective Responsibility and Interests during COVID-19Mathijs King HD 1080pJames Fraser: Rethinking Perturbation Theory (in the 1950s)Xavier Piccone - Mechanisms, Mathematics, and Motives: Towards a Radical Explanatory Pluralism...Stathis Psillos: Commentary on Scientific Ontology by Chakravartty (2/4)Armond Duwell - Pragmatism & The Philosophy of Science: Fall 2024 ConferenceThermodynamics as a Resource Theory: Day 1 General DiscussionBipasha Baruah: Library Series 2024: What does degrowth say about gender equality & social justice?QFT Discussion: What are the reasons for adopting an EFT point of view?Tushar Menon - Pragmatism & The Philosophy of Science: Fall 2024 Conference
Rotman Institute of Philosophy |

Carina Prunkl: Resource theories of thermodynamics and axiomatics: a comparison

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER