Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Steven Pinker, Barbara Tversky and Hilary Lawson discuss the complex relationship between language and thought.
Can we ever separate language and thought?
With a free trial, you can watch the full debate NOW at iai.tv/video/lost-in-thought?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description
We see language as the primary means we have to convey our ideas. And hugely powerful it is. Often cited as the central reason humans became the most dominant species on earth. But the relationship of language to thought is contentious and unknown. Once seen as a transparent medium for ideas, in the 20th century philosophers from Russell and Wittgenstein, to Heidegger and Derrida, overturned this everyday assumption arguing either that language was woven into the way that we think or more strongly that language was the structure of thought. But this view has been challenged by linguists and evolutionary biologists who maintain that thought is not the same as language and that we, and other living beings, have other forms of communication.
Should we see language as independent of thought and if so what does thought consist of? Or does language make thoughts possible and provide the framework through which we see the world? Or is the opposition of thought and language itself a mistake?
#philosophy #language #knowledge
Steven Pinker is a cognitive psychologist, linguist, and bestselling author known for his work on language and human nature. A Professor of Psychology at Harvard University, his books, including Enlightenment Now and The Better Angels of Our Nature, have made him one of the world’s most influential public thinkers.
Hilary Lawson is a philosopher and leading critic of realism. His major work, Closure: A Story of Everything, sets out a radical non-realist metaphysics that challenges traditional views of truth and the world.
Barbara Tversky is Emerita Professor of Psychology at Stanford and Professor of Psychology at Columbia Teachers College. A pioneer of embodied cognition, she has written extensively on memory, spatial thinking, and creativity, exploring how our minds shape the world we perceive.
Sophie Scott-Brown hosts.
The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=https://iai.tv/video/lost-in-thought
0:00 Intro
0:40 What is thought, if it's not language?
4:34 Is there a limit to how one can define the world?
7:24 Does the history of science point towards the foundational role of language?
9:23 How do we explain thoughts that cannot be easily verbalised?
12:25 Is there an 'ultimate thing' in the world that language can define?
For debates and talks: iai.tv
For articles: iai.tv/articles
For courses: iai.tv/iai-academy/courses
Steven Pinker, Barbara Tversky and Hilary Lawson discuss the complex relationship between language and thought.
Can we ever separate language and thought?
With a free trial, you can watch the full debate NOW at iai.tv/video/lost-in-thought?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description
We see language as the primary means we have to convey our ideas. And hugely powerful it is. Often cited as the central reason humans became the most dominant species on earth. But the relationship of language to thought is contentious and unknown. Once seen as a transparent medium for ideas, in the 20th century philosophers from Russell and Wittgenstein, to Heidegger and Derrida, overturned this everyday assumption arguing either that language was woven into the way that we think or more strongly that language was the structure of thought. But this view has been challenged by linguists and evolutionary biologists who maintain that thought is not the same as language and that we, and other living beings, have other forms of communication.
Should we see language as independent of thought and if so what does thought consist of? Or does language make thoughts possible and provide the framework through which we see the world? Or is the opposition of thought and language itself a mistake?
#philosophy #language #knowledge
Steven Pinker is a cognitive psychologist, linguist, and bestselling author known for his work on language and human nature. A Professor of Psychology at Harvard University, his books, including Enlightenment Now and The Better Angels of Our Nature, have made him one of the world’s most influential public thinkers.
Hilary Lawson is a philosopher and leading critic of realism. His major work, Closure: A Story of Everything, sets out a radical non-realist metaphysics that challenges traditional views of truth and the world.
Barbara Tversky is Emerita Professor of Psychology at Stanford and Professor of Psychology at Columbia Teachers College. A pioneer of embodied cognition, she has written extensively on memory, spatial thinking, and creativity, exploring how our minds shape the world we perceive.
Sophie Scott-Brown hosts.
The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=https://iai.tv/video/lost-in-thought
0:00 Intro
0:40 What is thought, if it's not language?
4:34 Is there a limit to how one can define the world?
7:24 Does the history of science point towards the foundational role of language?
9:23 How do we explain thoughts that cannot be easily verbalised?
12:25 Is there an 'ultimate thing' in the world that language can define?
For debates and talks: iai.tv
For articles: iai.tv/articles
For courses: iai.tv/iai-academy/courses
