Can Brian Cutter Save Substance Dualism? @JamesFodor
Can Brian Cutter Save Substance Dualism?  @JamesFodor
Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 7 hours ago
I respond to an interview in which Brian Cutter and Majesty of Reason respond to criticisms of substance dualism. I provide commentary and criticise their responses to the interaction problem, causal exclusion, pairing problem, and the issue of conservation of energy. I argue that substance dualism remains unmotivated, poorly defined, ad hoc, and inconsistent with modern science.

Link to original video:
youtube.com/watch?v=p41Ir-_9E-k
Can Brian Cutter Save Substance Dualism?The Case for God Is Weaker Than Ever: Reviewing William Lane Craigs Latest InterviewProgressive Christianity, Conservative Christianity, and the Christian RightYET MORE Apologetics Nonsense about Fine-TuningMore Bad Theist Arguments about Consciousness  - Buckle up!Was Jesus Resurrected? Robert Martin vs James Fodor DebateClassical Theism vs Naturalism - Canadian Catholic vs James FodorHow Capturing Christianity Misrepresents the History of ScienceThe Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism - James Fodor vs Maverick ChristianHow Inspiring Philosophy Misrepresents ScienceLogic Doesnt Need God - Responding to James AndersonLets Review some Capturing Christianity: The Resurrection and Apologetics Culture
James Fodor |

Can Brian Cutter Save Substance Dualism?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER