Uploaded February 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Brendan Schaub has sensationally lost a lawsuit against YouTuber, Kyle Swindelles, ending a two year battle to silence his criticism.
This video breaks down the details from the judgement, the timeline of events as well as Brendan Schaub's comments about the lawsuit along the way.
#tfatk #tigerbelly #jre
All clips used in this video are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code.
This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting.
Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Brendan Schaub has sensationally lost a lawsuit against YouTuber, Kyle Swindelles, ending a two year battle to silence his criticism.
This video breaks down the details from the judgement, the timeline of events as well as Brendan Schaub's comments about the lawsuit along the way.
#tfatk #tigerbelly #jre
All clips used in this video are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code.
This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting.
Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
