Bolus Russian Roulette @Campbellteaching

Dr. John Campbell | Bolus Russian Roulette @Campbellteaching | Uploaded September 2024 | Updated October 2024, 1 day ago.
Are we playing a game of chance when we give intramuscular injections? Great talk with Marc Girardot, get a copy of his new book from the links below,

Amazon.com
amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=pd_ci_mcx_mh_mcx_views_0?pd_rd_w=qVPAt&content-id=amzn1.sym.352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20%3Aamzn1.symc.40e6a10e-cbc4-4fa5-81e3-4435ff64d03b&pf_rd_p=352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20&pf_rd_r=3EB82W4HKGJEZVRV3STA&pd_rd_wg=bO1kt&pd_rd_r=f9bd866f-f42d-48a7-a6d6-59b8804f9426&pd_rd_i=B0CYLSCMHN

Amazon.co.uk
amazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=pd_ci_mcx_mh_mcx_views_0?pd_rd_w=qVPAt&content-id=amzn1.sym.352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20%3Aamzn1.symc.40e6a10e-cbc4-4fa5-81e3-4435ff64d03b&pf_rd_p=352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20&pf_rd_r=3EB82W4HKGJEZVRV3STA&pd_rd_wg=bO1kt&pd_rd_r=f9bd866f-f42d-48a7-a6d6-59b8804f9426&pd_rd_i=B0CYLSCMHN

Amazon.fr
https://www.amazon.fr/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=sr_1_2?crid=2ER2T61DEEI5L&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.75-2QJd4R_xSqda394yRaAEp-qly5-R2xri5GgmoM64.443LyNfZ91VYOZPuOXu3oZWaaRr7vBMDtcdLGIoEYg4&dib_tag=se&keywords=marc+girardot&qid=1727289895&sprefix=%2Caps%2C131&sr=8-2

Amazon.com.au
https://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=pd_ci_mcx_mh_mcx_views_0?pd_rd_w=qVPAt&content-id=amzn1.sym.352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20%3Aamzn1.symc.40e6a10e-cbc4-4fa5-81e3-4435ff64d03b&pf_rd_p=352fa4e9-2aa8-47c3-b5ac-8a90ddbece20&pf_rd_r=3EB82W4HKGJEZVRV3STA&pd_rd_wg=bO1kt&pd_rd_r=f9bd866f-f42d-48a7-a6d6-59b8804f9426&pd_rd_i=B0CYLSCMHN

Here's what Amazon Readers say about the book:
Customers find the book extraordinarily informative, well-researched, and well-documented. They describe it as surprisingly readable and helping them understand even the most complex topics. Readers also mention the pacing is fascinating and provocative.

Dr.Clare Craig: "Marc is making a very important contribution to the understanding of vaccine harm. His book is excellent."
Neil Oliver: "Read it in three hours! Couldn’t put it down. It’s a harrowing read, but it simply makes sense and fits the missing pieces of the jigsaw."
Here is the Table of Content of "The Needle's Secret: Unraveling the Mystery of Vaccine Harm, and the Bolus Theory Revolution"

Introduction 11
Part One - Red Flag To Red Flag 19
Chapter 1 - Discovering Covid 21
Chapter 2 - We Were All Immune Already 25
Chapter 3 - The Case For Low Fatality Rate 28
Chapter 4 - Unbelievable Evidence: Not Effective, Nor Safe 36
Part Two - Most Are Fine. Too Many Aren't 41
Chapter 5 - Signals Were Never Weak 44
Chapter 6 - Preliminary Hints 54
Chapter 7 - Concording Evidence 59
Chapter 8 - Not All Are Harmed 64
Chapter 9 - The Devil In The Details 73
Chapter 10 - The Reality Of Accidental Intravascular Injections 86
Part Three - Rampage Down The Circulatory System 107
Chapter 11 - A Fantastic Voyage of Destruction 110
Chapter 12 - Extreme Concentration Baseline 116
Chapter 13 - Deterministic Particle Behavior 122
Chapter 14 - Cytotoxic Scenarios 130
Chapter 15 - Endothelial Stripping: Aneurysm/White Clot Syndrome 133
Chapter 16 - Systemic Lining Damage 139
Chapter 17 - Coagulation Overload & Necrosis 142
Chapter 18 - Endothelium Micro-Perforation 146
Chapter 19 - Disrupting Stem-Cells 152
Chapter 19 - Bolus Collateral: Multiple Hits, Severities, Locations & Illnesses 156
Part Four - Bolus-Induced Illnesses 159

$Official denial Direct link to TV Parliament site, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252 Direct link to Hansard https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeaths Let me move to some of the questions that we must raise and answer today, openly and transparently, and with full access to ONS record-level data. I am not saying that that should be disclosed to all and sundry, but surely the Government cannot defend the position that they are not willing to release that information to interested clinicians and clinical academics as a minimum. Those are the people who need to interrogate the data. It is of little relevance to me—I do not have the means or academic ability to interpret it—but it is something that interested clinical academics should have access to. Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood. Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to the Toggle showing location of Column 528 spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done. In a recent written answer to me, it was confirmed that the MHRA has received 489,004 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction reports relating to the covid-19 vaccine, up to and including 28 February this year. Across the United Kingdom, 2,734 of those reports were associated with a fatal outcome. Of course the true number is unknown—that is the nature of yellow card reporting, as only a fraction of adverse events are reported—and that is probably because of limited public awareness about some of the potential consequences and complications of vaccines, and the well-understood under-reporting of those adverse events. That is important, because the yellow card system is a key element of safe and effective clinical care. If things are not being evaluated properly, I can think of no greater betrayal of the MHRA’s clinical governance responsibility. I suggest that accountability for that must be swift and decisive. The rigorous assessment of these data is essential and must be actioned urgently. Will the Minister now engage with the MHRA and invite it to come to the House to explain the facts on these reports? Another issue, which arises from a further written question that I tabled, relates to the role of the MHRA. It has a crucial role—in fact, it is a statutory function—to provide post-marketing surveillance and to operate the yellow card system, but the Minister responded to my question about the assessment of the potential implications of the BMJ article “Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is ‘likely’ responsible for deaths of some elderly patients, Norwegian review finds” by stating: “The MHRA communicates safety advice based upon consideration of the totality of evidence from all relevant information sources, rather than the strengths and limitations of individual data sources.” Surely, a fundamental step in any meta-analysis of published data is to interrogate the robustness of those data and for the public to have confidence that that is happening.$

$Stroke and death after Moderna Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/ Keywords: COVID-19; Moderna vaccine; cerebral edema; neurology; stroke. McMillan N, Rosenberg HJ, Anderson MP, Pal P, Stephenson K, Fehnel CR. Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia. Neurohospitalist. 2023 Apr;13(2):156-158. doi: 10.1177/19418744221136898. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PMID: 37064937; PMCID: PMC10091442. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Background Venous thromboses have been linked to several COVID-19 vaccines Here we describe a case of post-Moderna COVID-19 vaccination arterial infarct, with vaccine-associated diffuse cortical edema, that was complicated by refractory intracranial hypertension. Case summary 24 hrs after receiving her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, a 30-year-old female developed severe headache. Three weeks later she was admitted with subacute headache and confusion. Imaging initially showed scattered cortical thrombosis with an elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture. An external ventricular drain was placed, but she continued to have elevated intracranial pressure. Ultimately, she required a hemicraniectomy, but intractable cerebral edema resulted in her death. Pathology was consistent with thrombosis and associated inflammatory response. Conclusion Though correlational, her medical team surmised that the mRNA vaccine may have contributed to this presentation. The side effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccination are still incompletely understood. Though complications are rare, clinicians should be aware of presentations like this one. More information Had prior asymptomatic COVID-19 infection three months earlier 24-hours after first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna). Developed severe, atypical throbbing bi-frontal headache Headaches were atypical (no prior headaches) Three weeks after vaccination Developed blurred vision and confusion Bifrontal headache with photophobia Lumbar puncture revealed lymphocytosis Broad spectrum antimicrobial coverage was started. Her mental status acutely worsened later that evening New left hemiparesis. Elevated D-dimer CSF cultures and PCR testing returned negative Intracranial pressure remained refractory to maximal medical management, including deep sedation, paralysis and hypothermia, prompting a right decompressive hemicraniectomy. The patient expired from refractory cerebral edema. Brain autopsy showed infiltrates of CD8 and CD4-positive T-cells, in association with intravascular thrombi Fungal and bacterial stains were negative. Discussion Diffuse endothelial damage and vessel wall inflammation, suggested an underlying pro-thrombotic state and T cell inflammatory response. The arterial infarct in this case is likely related to a pro-thrombotic state Due to the large volume of infarction, the patient was not started on anticoagulation after extensive discussion of the risks vs potential benefit. In summary, administration of COVID-19 vaccine was considered a possible cause of the extensive multifocal arterial thromboses with associated inflammatory response and elevated intracranial pressure given the temporal association. The mechanism for initial elevation in intracranial pressure is not known but may relate to cerebral autoregulatory changes in the setting of cortical microvascular thrombosis. https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fatal-post-covid-19-mrna-vaccine?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=144566381&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1f3dql&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) such as this would have put a pause on the entire study and an investigation into why this happened and a call for risk mitigation measures to prevent the same complication from happening to more subjects.$