Uploaded March 2018 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
-Composer: Béla Viktor János Bartók (25 March 1881 – 26 September 1945)
-Performers: James Ehnes (Violin), Andrew Armstrong (Piano)
Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 2, Sz. 76 (BB. 85) written in 1922
00:00 – I. Molto moderato
08:35 – II. Allegretto
Despite their conventionally accepted numbering, Béla Bartók's First and Second violin sonatas were actually the composer's fourth and fifth works in that genre. Bartók's three earlier sonatas, composed during his student years, are in a Romantic, almost Brahmsian, vein, and show few signs of the bold strides the composer was to make more than two decades later. During the years preceding the First and Second sonatas, Bartók, an accomplished pianist, often performed with violinists. He dedicated these two sonatas to one such musician, Jelly d'Arányi, a Hungarian-born violinist living in London. Performances of these works with d'Arányi and others quickly spread Bartók's reputation throughout Europe and garnered praise from Stravinsky, Ravel, Szymanowski, Poulenc, and Milhaud. In this work, which was composed between July and November 1922, Bartók abandoned the traditional three-movement form of the Sonata No. 1, creating, instead, a more unified, two-movement composition. Nevertheless, the two works share some common features: their assimilation of Schoenberg's extreme chromaticism, and their finales, where the influence of dance music from Eastern European folk traditions comes to the fore. Of course, these movements are not actual folk music, but instead, a highly stylized treatment of folk-like material that prompted Bartók to warn a fellow Hungarian pianist: "We must be careful to avoid any attempt to put on such works as my two Sonatas for violin...in places where the level of music appreciation is as low as it is in Hungarian country towns. Such works would merely rouse antagonism in an audience which has not been trained to listen." The structure of this Sonata, for which the composer himself expressed a preference, can be considered a metaphor for the development of folk song as a natural outgrowth of improvisation. The work opens with a long melody in the style of a hora lunga -- a free improvisation found in Romanian peasant music -- that uses a small group of motivic patterns. This theme returns twice: once in an agitated guise at the end of the first movement, and then once again at the end, the climax of the sonata. In this final appearance, played in the violin's high register, the theme takes on a more stabilized shape in the context of the movement's dance rhythm. Bartók scholar Lászlo Somfai concludes that this plan reveals a hidden program to the sonata: "Bartók recreated the evolution of peasant music...in miniature, from the improvisatory 'ur-form' (using his own themes) to the crystallized stanzaic formation of lyric songs."
[allmusic.com]
-Composer: Béla Viktor János Bartók (25 March 1881 – 26 September 1945)
-Performers: James Ehnes (Violin), Andrew Armstrong (Piano)
Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 2, Sz. 76 (BB. 85) written in 1922
00:00 – I. Molto moderato
08:35 – II. Allegretto
Despite their conventionally accepted numbering, Béla Bartók's First and Second violin sonatas were actually the composer's fourth and fifth works in that genre. Bartók's three earlier sonatas, composed during his student years, are in a Romantic, almost Brahmsian, vein, and show few signs of the bold strides the composer was to make more than two decades later. During the years preceding the First and Second sonatas, Bartók, an accomplished pianist, often performed with violinists. He dedicated these two sonatas to one such musician, Jelly d'Arányi, a Hungarian-born violinist living in London. Performances of these works with d'Arányi and others quickly spread Bartók's reputation throughout Europe and garnered praise from Stravinsky, Ravel, Szymanowski, Poulenc, and Milhaud. In this work, which was composed between July and November 1922, Bartók abandoned the traditional three-movement form of the Sonata No. 1, creating, instead, a more unified, two-movement composition. Nevertheless, the two works share some common features: their assimilation of Schoenberg's extreme chromaticism, and their finales, where the influence of dance music from Eastern European folk traditions comes to the fore. Of course, these movements are not actual folk music, but instead, a highly stylized treatment of folk-like material that prompted Bartók to warn a fellow Hungarian pianist: "We must be careful to avoid any attempt to put on such works as my two Sonatas for violin...in places where the level of music appreciation is as low as it is in Hungarian country towns. Such works would merely rouse antagonism in an audience which has not been trained to listen." The structure of this Sonata, for which the composer himself expressed a preference, can be considered a metaphor for the development of folk song as a natural outgrowth of improvisation. The work opens with a long melody in the style of a hora lunga -- a free improvisation found in Romanian peasant music -- that uses a small group of motivic patterns. This theme returns twice: once in an agitated guise at the end of the first movement, and then once again at the end, the climax of the sonata. In this final appearance, played in the violin's high register, the theme takes on a more stabilized shape in the context of the movement's dance rhythm. Bartók scholar Lászlo Somfai concludes that this plan reveals a hidden program to the sonata: "Bartók recreated the evolution of peasant music...in miniature, from the improvisatory 'ur-form' (using his own themes) to the crystallized stanzaic formation of lyric songs."
[allmusic.com]
![Edvard Grieg - Slåtter, op. 72 [With score]
-Composer: Edvard Hagerup Grieg (15 June 1843 – 4 September 1907)
-Performer: Einar Steen-Nøkleberg
17 Slåtter (Norwegian Peasant Dances) for Piano, op. 72, written in 1902-03
00:00 - I. Giboens bridal march
02:48 - II. John Vestafes springdans
04:44 - III. Bridal march from Telemark
08:17 - IV. Halling from the hills (Tune from the Fairy Hill)
12:06 - V. Prillar from the churchplay Os (Tune for the Goat-horn)
13:19 - VI. Gangar
14:42 - VII. Røtnams-Knut. Halling
19:16 - VIII. Myllargutens wedding march
22:51 - IX. Nils Rekves halling
23:59 - X. Knut Luråsens Halling I
25:17 - XI. Knut Luråsens Halling II
28:03 - XII. Myllargutens Spring dance
29:09 - XIII. Havard Gibboens dream on the Oterholts bridge
30:55 - XIV. The goblins bridal procession at Vossevangen. Gangar
33:17 - XV. The bride of Skuldal. Gangar
36:08 - XVI. The girls from Kivledal. Spring dance
38:09 - XVII. The girls from Kivledal. Gangar
In April 1888, Edvard Grieg was contacted by Knut Dale, who requested that the composer aid him in an effort to notate some of the slåtter, or folk dance tunes, that he was known for performing on the hardanger-fiddle. The hardanger-fiddle was regarded as the national instrument of Norway at the time. These folk dance tunes, most of which had been passed along for many generations, were passed to Dale from another fiddler, Torgier Augundsson, who was also known as Myllarguten, or The Millers Boy. Augundsson often performed at Bulls National Theater in the town of Bergen in 1850. Grieg was not initially eager about the project due to the certain difficulty of transcribing this traditional style of folk music. Yet he decided to arrange for the preservation of these folkdance tunes because he feared that they would be forever lost in later times. The composer contacted the Norwegian violinist Johann Halvorsen in October of 1901 requesting that he spend time with Dale, in order to notate a number of the slåtter. Grieg would then transcribe the folk dance tunes for solo piano. By the end of the year, Halvorsen had completed the transcription of 17 of Dales best folk dance tunes. Grieg spent almost an entire year working on arranging Halvorsens work for piano, to produce his Norwegian Dances (1902).
Norwegian Dances was published in its two versions, Halvorsens for violin and his own for piano, in one volume at Griegs insistence. The composer also insisted that it be made clear that his transcription for piano was based on Halvorsens work. Both versions also include information on the extensive background of the folk dance tunes. Although the material for this work was conceived of originally by Grieg, it is nevertheless an important step in his musical development, as well as in the course of the early twentieth century. In fact, in 1906, the work made quite an impression on the young Impressionist musicians of Paris, who referred to it as the new Grieg.
The first of these folk dance tunes for piano is Havard Gibeons Bridal March, which is rhythmically strict throughout. The next of the tunes, Jon Vestafes Sprindans, can be described rhythmically as being bouncy. Jon Vestafe, according to legend, was suspected of murder and at his trial he asked for just one wish, to play one slått. He played so amazingly that he was immediately set free. The sixth slåtter, Myllargutens Gangar, is very complex rhythmically with confusing patterns of accenting and slurring. The eighth folk dance tune is Myllargutens Wedding March, a somber song which was written by Augundsson for a former love interest who left him to marry someone else. Arguably the finest piece of the cycle is the 11th slåtter, Knut Lurasens Halling II. It is the most stylistically varied of the entire set of folk dance tunes. The 13th folk dance tune contains the most dissonant passages of the composition, but also has very tender sections. The final slåtter transcription ends the work fittingly in a stately, nationalistic manner.
[allmusic.com] Edvard Grieg - Slåtter, op. 72 [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nCEJ1JNAOGg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Paul Hindemith - String Quartet No. 7 [With score]
-Composer: Paul Hindemith (16 November 1895 – 28 December 1963)
-Performers: Amar Quartet [Anna Brunner (Violin), Igor Keller (Violin), Hannes Bärtschi (Viola), Peter Somodari (Cello)]
String Quartet No. 7 in E-flat Major, written in 1945
00:00 - I. Schnell
02:50 - II. Ruhig. Scherzando
05:20 - III. Langsam - Schnell - Langsam
11:22 - IV. Kanon, mäßig schnell - heiter Paul Hindemith - String Quartet No. 7 [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nskb4ipWn1Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![Anton Webern - Quartet (op. 22) [With score]
Composer: Anton Webern (3 December 1883 15 September 1945)
Performers: Charles Rosen (piano), Daniel Majeske (violin), Robert Marcellus (clarinet), Abraham Weinstein (saxophone)
Conductor: Pierre Boulez
Quartet for violin, clarinet, tenor saxophone and piano, op. 22, written between 1928-1930
00:00 - I. Sehr mäßig
03:30 - II. Sehr schwungvoll
Webern wrote his Quartet for violin, clarinet, tenor saxophone, and piano, Op. 22 (1928-1930) for the 60th birthday of architect Adolf Loos. As happened during the composition of his String Trio, Op. 20 (1926-1927), Webern discarded sketches for a projected third movement after deeming the first two movements a complete entity. Another connection the quartet shares with the String Trio is an opaque structure Stravinsky described as scatty.
The quartet was originally intended as a sort of reflection of nature, depicting landscapes and flora. After Webern had sketched themes according to this intent, the work gradually morphed into its completely different final form. The canons that had by this time begun to permeate Weberns music are more loosely realized in the quartet than in the composers previous works. In the first movement, for example, their most conspicuous feature is a two-note limping motive, a short-long rhythm that is later reversed; in the middle of the movement, the motive is sounded both in its original rhythmic values and in augmentation.
The second movement alludes to techniques Webern more fully developed in his Concerto, Op. 24 (1931-1934). Most prominent is the splintering of notes within a phrase among the various instruments in the sort of intricate pointillistic texture that became one of the most identifiable hallmarks of the composers style. When uniformly unfavorable reviews poured in after the quartets premiere in Vienna on April 13, 1931, Webern was unworried. Though the performance must have been superb the personnel included violinist Rudolf Kolisch and pianist Eduard Steuermann one critic wrote that the work displayed amazing similarity to certain basic human utterances of an indecent nature.
Original Audio with description: https://youtu.be/sXE8ha8-Xx4 and http://www.allmusic.com/composition/quartet-for-clarinet-saxophone-piano-violin-op-22-mc0002388432 Anton Webern - Quartet (op. 22) [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oF-dk5ieDDg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Alban Berg - Lulu Suite [With score]
-Composer: Alban Berg (9 February 1885 - 24 December 1935)
-Orchestra: City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra
-Conductor: Sir Simon Rattle
-Soprano: Arleen Auger
Lulu-Suite, 5 symphonic pieces from the opera for soprano & orchestra, written in 1934
00:00 - I. Rondo (Andante & hymn)
14:50 - II. Ostinato (Allegro)
18:39 - III. Lied der Lulu [Lulus song] (Comodo)
21:39 - IV. Variationen [Variations] (Moderato)
25:06 - V. Adagio (Sostenuto, lento, grave)
Alban Berg assembled his Lulu Suite for orchestra and soprano in 1934. This suite involves music from his opera Lulu, which was still incomplete when the composer died prematurely at the age of fifty in the following year. The operas short score was already finished, and the first two acts were completely orchestrated. It was from these first two movements that the music for the concert suite was drawn. It is in five movements and is slightly more than a half hour in duration. Earlier in his career, Berg had created a similar assemblage from his first opera, entitled Three Fragments from Wozzeck, but the Lulu Suite is better known and more frequently recorded. This is perhaps because the latter work is more diverse. The Wozzeck pieces concentrate exclusively on the music surrounding the protagonists wife Marie. In the Lulu Suite, listeners hear music concerning a broad range of characters. The opening setting concerns Alwa, one of Lulus many lovers. His father is Doctor Schoen, to whom the main character delivers her Lied der Lulu in Act II of the opera and in the third movement of the concert suite. In the fifth movement, the soprano also performs a brief excerpt from the role of Countess Geschwitz, another fatality to Lulus charms. The orchestral interludes include music set in Paris and the East Side of London, where Jack the Ripper murders Lulu. The concert suite also features different musical forms, including a rondo and a set of variations. There is a lot to hear in this suite, making it something more than a contracted showcase intended to get an audience to the actual opera. It is an outstanding work in its own right.
The text is by Wedekind, an elder peer of the composer who originally conceived of the opera as a play in which he also sometimes performed. In fact, when Berg was a young man, still a teen in 1903, he saw a play production of Lulu featuring Wedekind as Jack the Ripper. The playwrights wife recorded in her diary seeing the young and handsome composer in the audience. The play had an enormous effect on Berg, as his enthusiastic praises of the work in his letters demonstrate. Though he had a stately bearing matched with an outward, bourgeois respectability, the Austrian was no angel. Unlike Webern, his friend and fellow student of Schoenberg at the time, Berg did not shy away from the seamier side of life. He regarded sensuality as an enormous energy deserving of the same respect as other human traits. This may have been used as an excuse for his extramarital affairs, though it was not a part of his life that he shared with his more pious friends. Berg did not go to shocking excesses in order to live out his worldview, but he did attempt to woo married women and did similar sorts of unlovely things. To the benefit of music, his overt sensuality carried over into his art perfectly. His depictions of the darker side of human nature are often more mysterious and ambiguous than a one-dimensional evocation of evil. Though Lulu killed people and Jack the Ripper did the same, the opera unfolds with a musical setting that depicts a raw and unknowable element in the human psyche that civilization grasps blindly at in order to tame it. This setting is transferred from the opera to the Lulu Suite with uncanny perfection, revealing a talented genius that regarded some weaknesses and a misunderstood power.
[allmusic.com] Alban Berg - Lulu Suite [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ooM3YF2aQBg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Edvard Grieg - 5 Songs, op. 60 [With score]
-Composer: Edvard Hagerup Grieg (15 June 1843 – 4 September 1907)
-Performers: Monica Groop (Voice), Ilmo Ranta (Piano)
5 songs for Voice and Piano, op. 60, written in 1893-94
00:00 - I. Liden Kirsten {Little Kirsten}
03:48 - II. Moderen synger {The mothers lament}
06:14 - III. Mens jeg venter {While I wait}
08:33 - IV. Der skreg en Fugl {There Screeched a Bird}
10:37 - V. Og jeg vil ha mig en Hjertenskjær {And I will take a sweetheart}
The five songs in Digte (Poems), Op. 60, were completed in 1894 and composed to texts by Vilhelm Krag. Dedicated to the Dutch baritone Johannes Messchaert (regarded as among the finest concert singers of his age), they were premiered by him in Copenhagen on January 20, 1894. Krags arch-Romantic imagery served Grieg well in the creation of these unceasingly interesting lyric expressions.
The first song, Liden Kirsten (Little Kirsten) has a folk-like temperament, well suited to the bright simplicity of the poem. The second song, Moderen synger (The Mother Sings) is an anguished lament, arrestingly modern in its use of a hesitating melody set over an unsettlingly dissonant accompaniment. Mens jeg venter (While I Wait) is frequently performed apart from the other songs in this opus and presents a superb example of the composers sophistication as well as his gift for freshness of utterance. The harmonization is chromatic, often changing key and supporting melodic cells with startling effect. The fourth song, Der skreg en Fugl (There Screeched a Bird) attests to the composers close observation of natures sounds. In the introduction and final measures of this song, Grieg used a motif from one of his sketchbooks, noted as the cry of a seagull heard near the Hardanger fjord. The song is dramatic and impressionistic at the same time, prevailingly bleak and singular in its use of minor seventh chords near the ending, voiced over the sustaining pedal throughout the sequence to create a blurred and dissonant effect. The song seems to simply hang in suspension at its conclusion. The final song, Og jeg vil ha mig en Hjertenskjær (And I will Take a Sweetheart) is an exuberant outburst of high spirits and a superb encore piece. It is found in the song repertoires of many singers who do not otherwise program much of Griegs music.
[allmusic.com] Edvard Grieg - 5 Songs, op. 60 [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ouNvW2KgmDA/mqdefault.jpg)
![William Walton - Viola Concerto [With score]
Composer: Sir William Turner Walton (29 March 1902 – 8 March 1983)
Orchestra: Sofia Symphonic Orchestra
Conductor: Ljubka Biagioni
Viola: Simonide Braconi
Viola Concerto, written in 1928/ revised in 1961
00:00 - I. Andante comodo
09:02 - II. Vivo, con molto preciso
13:34 - III. Allegro moderato
In 1928, the conductor Sir Thomas Beecham suggested to Walton that he write a concerto for the eminent violist Lionel Tertis. The composer agreed and started work on it almost immediately; on completion he sent it to Tertis who, much to Waltons disappointment, rejected it. In his biography, My Viola and I (Elek, 1974) Tertis relented: I had not learnt to appreciate Waltons style. The innovations in his musical language which now seem so logical and so truly in the mainstream of music then struck me as far-fetched. The composer and violist Paul Hindemith gave the first performance in London in October 1929, when the Sunday Times critic Ernest Newman wrote, somewhat unenthusiastically, The composer has a grasp of musical logic, a sense of fitness and a command of craftsmanship that is very unusual in a young man. In 1960, and again in 1961, Walton ever the perfectionist extensively revised the work, but it has never been among his most-admired compositions.
Tertis original reservations may well have had something to do with the fact that the concerto is not, in any obvious sense, a showpiece for the viola. It certainly makes virtuosic demands on the soloist, but its strengths lie in the intimate dialogues between viola and orchestra and the intricate, almost casual, way in which the themes are crafted.
In the first movement, Andante commodo, the music, though lyrical, is haunted by feelings of restlessness, with frequent time changes and shifts of harmony. There is even a trace of impatience in the way, rising to its highest register, the viola delivers its own version of the second subject.
The second movement, Vivo con molto preciso, has three main thematic ideas. It opens with fast, rhythmic figures tossed between orchestra and soloist, abruptly cut short by quiet chords in the brass and followed by lively explorations by the soloist. The movement closes with a more contemplative version of the opening theme, and ends quietly.
The final movement, Allegro moderato, the longest of the three, starts with a rather unpromising melody for bassoon, soon to be expanded, enriched, and brought to a climax by the viola before being passed to the orchestra. The poetic sincerity with which Walton returns to earlier themes as the movement draws to a close is among the concertos finest moments.
[allmusic.com]
Original Performance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nElLYUTuGgs
NB: Please note that both audio and sheet music are NOT mine. If you have complains about this upload concerning copyright issues, please write me a direct message. In that case, I will delete the video immediately. William Walton - Viola Concerto [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ozL-R0yWhPs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Haram Kim - 24 Pieces for Instruments No. 3 Little French [With score]
Composer: Haram Kim (b. 1998)
Performer: Haram Kim
Composers note: Please understand my lack of professionalism in sound quality and piano playing since I am major in Violin performance. I hope you enjoy the piece! Haram Kim - 24 Pieces for Instruments No. 3 Little French [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/p5GVl6Eb7f4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Edvard Grieg - 9 Romances and Songs, op. 18 [With score]
-Composer: Edvard Hagerup Grieg (15 June 1843 – 4 September 1907)
-Performers: Monica Groop (Voice), Roger Vignoles (Piano)
Romances and Songs for Voice and Piano, op. 18, written in 1865-69
00:00 - I. Vandring i Skoven {Wandering in the woods}
01:57 - II. Hun er saa hvid {She is so white}
03:25 - III. En Digters sidste Sang {A poets last song}
05:42 - IV. Efteraarsstormen {Autumn storms}
09:11 - V. Poesien {Poesy}
12:57 - VI. Ungbirken {The young birch tree}
14:50 - VII. Hytten {The hut} (For danish text turn subtitles on)
16:18 - VIII. Rosenknoppen {The rosebud}
18:27 - IX. Serenade til Welhaven {Serenade to Welhaven} Edvard Grieg - 9 Romances and Songs, op. 18 [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pFE6RpwHLrY/mqdefault.jpg)
![Edvard Grieg - Two symphonic pieces, op. 14 [With score]
-Composer: Edvard Hagerup Grieg (15 June 1843 – 4 September 1907)
-Performers: The Cologne Piano Duo
Deux pièces symphoniques {Two symphonic pieces} for Piano four hands, op. 14, written in 1869
00:03 - I. Adagio cantabile
04:42 - II. Allegro energico Edvard Grieg - Two symphonic pieces, op. 14 [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pNYV14alDNM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Maurice Ravel - Shéhérazade [With score] (Reupload)
Composer: Joseph-Maurice Ravel (7 March 1875 28 December 1937)
Mezzo-Soprano: Anne Sofie von Otter
Conductor: Pierre Boulez
Orchestra: The Cleveland Orchestra
Shéhérazade - Trois poèmes pour chant et orchestre sur les vers de Tristan Klingsor [Three poems for voice and orchestra on verses by Tristan Klingsor]
00:00 - I. Asie
09:54 - II. La flûte enchantée
13:02 - III. Lindifférent
Ravel was drawn to the sensual allure of the Orient as early as 1898, when he composed the Ouverture de Shéhérazade, a work which quotes a Persian melody while drawing on the spiritual ancestry of Rimsky-Korsakovs Sheherazade of 1888. He returned to its title in 1903 for this cycle of three songs for mezzo-soprano and orchestra, based on the exotic texts of the French poet Tristan Klingsor. With Shéhérazade, his first major statement for orchestra, Ravel demonstrates his mastery of muted and climactic orchestral details, while eliciting equal measures of ecstasy and restraint for the human voice.
Like the story in Rimsky-Korsakovs famous suite, Shéhérazade conjures up Eastern tales of indulgence, perversity, death and danger. The first poem, Asie opens with a hushed string tremolo, followed by a meandering oboe melody, establishing a seductive atmosphere of Oriental fantasy. The opening four lines are declaimed syllabically and recitative-like (Asia, Asia, Asia/marvelous old land of nursery tales/where fantasy sleeps like an empress/in her forest filled with mystery). Pentatonic scale figures, grace notes and fluttering strings further impart the poems chilling decadence, leading to an accelerating climax on the words I would like to see those who die for love as well as those who die for hatred. The piece falls silent and shimmers to a close, as the recitative of the opening concludes the tale over a faintly rolling timpani.
La Flute enchantée and Lindifferent, are considerably shorter than Asie, and each song concludes with a brief yet subtly modified reference to the opening theme.
La Flute enchantée is a timeless portrait of a girl listening to the sounds of a flute, while Lindifferent sometimes regarded as the most beautiful of all of Ravels songs concerns the attraction of the unattainable. If all three of the Tristan Klingsor settings in the cycle are expressions of longing, this final one finds a particularly personal tone, through false modality, and a final pandiatonically extended triad with a major ninth. After Shéhérazade, Ravel wrote no song with an erotic theme until he completed Chansons madécasses in 1926.
[allmusic.com] Maurice Ravel - Shéhérazade [With score] (Reupload)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/paZ7LXd_wKM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Igor Stravinsky - Piano Concerto [Concerto for piano and wind instruments] [With score]
Composer: Igor Fyodorovich Stravinsky (17 June 1882 6 April 1971)
Piano: Alexander Toradze
Orchestra: Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra
Conductor: Valery Gergiev
Concerto for piano and wind instruments, written between 1923-1924
00:00 - I. Largo - Allegro - Più mosso - Maestoso
07:46 - II. Largo - Più mosso - Tempo primo
16:13 - III. Allegro - Agitato - Lento - Stringendo
In the early 1920s, the recent war having wreaked havoc on his personal finances, Igor Stravinsky set about ensuring the future security of his family by exploring avenues of musical life more immediately lucrative. One result of this was a rich series of works featuring the pianoforte in a solo role, designed quite specifically with Stravinsky himself as the pianist. In 1921, he fashioned three extracts from the ballet Petrushka into the Trois Mouvements de Petrouchka for Arthur Rubinstein. Finding, however, that he could not successfully bring off so technically demanding a work, the composer made certain that all of his forthcoming pianoforte compositions lay well within the realm of his own technical capabilities. The Concerto for Piano and Winds was composed in 1923-1924 for performance at one of Koussevitzkys Paris Concerts. It is the first representative in a new line of works that would eventually reach into the last decade of his active life, though by the time of Movements in 1959, Stravinsky was no longer in a position to give the premiere himself. In addition, the concerto is the first large-scale concert work to put to use Stravinskys new neo-Classical style. Since the premiere at the Paris Opera House on May 22, 1924, it has become one of his best-known and most dearly loved works.
Perhaps the most immediately striking aspect of the concerto, ignoring the strong affinities that the basic musical gestures have to those of the Baroque era, is the removal of the string section from the ensemble. Only the string basses remain, Stravinsky having decided that the same all-wind ensemble that he had already used in the Symphonies of Wind Instruments, the Octet, and, for all intents and purposes, the opera Mavra better complemented the timbre of the pianoforte.
The work is in three movements: 1) Largo - Allegro; 2) Larghissimo; and 3) Allegro. After the mock-grandiose, fundamentally Baroque Largo orchestral introduction, the piano enters with a rhythmically energized theme from which almost all the material of the movement is drawn in one way or another. Following the precedent set in his last few piano works, the piano is used in a very percussive manner. After a very long absence, sonata form, or something very like it, has returned to Stravinskys bag of tricks in this movement. The Largo introduction comes back, much modified, as a coda. The piano begins the second movement alone, offering a lyric theme whose gentle steadiness is balanced by thick, ponderous chords beneath. Stravinsky makes room for two cadenzas as the movement unfolds. At the end of the final Allegro movement, the Largo introduction to the first movement is heard from again, only to this time fade away into a pause that suddenly bursts into the Vivo plunge to the final C major cadence. In 1950, Stravinsky made a revision of the concerto, making a few small changes of instrumentation and many more substantial alterations to the metronome and tempo markings; in the 1950 version, the title of the second movement has been changed from Larghissimo to Largo.
[allmusic.com]
Original Video: https://youtu.be/QS7d8fI9hPw Igor Stravinsky - Piano Concerto [Concerto for piano and wind instruments] [With score]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pyRX_bq3Tds/mqdefault.jpg)