BJJ Is Basically Just Judo @EnglishMartialArts
BJJ Is Basically Just Judo  @EnglishMartialArts
Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
Is Brazilian Jiu Jitsu basically just Judo?

You’ll hear that claim all the time.

Same roots. Same techniques. Same origin.
So BJJ is just Judo… right?

No.

In this video I break down the actual history—what happened when Mitsuyo Maeda left Japan, what he was actually doing when he faced wrestlers under different rules, and how figures like Sadakazu Uyenishi fit into the story.

This isn’t the simplified version.

We’re looking at:

How Judo developed from multiple jiu jitsu schools
Why fighters like Mataemon Tanabe exposed weaknesses in early Kodokan Judo
How those same problems reappear when Maeda travels and fights under different conditions
And how the art that eventually becomes Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is shaped by cross-training, challenge matches, and rule sets

Because once you understand that…

It becomes very clear why BJJ isn’t just Judo.

If you’re interested in:

the real history of martial arts
how rule sets shape fighting systems
and why “origin” doesn’t define an art

you’re in the right place.

Subscribe for more videos on historical martial arts, pugilism, and the real stories behind how these systems developed.
BJJ Is Basically Just JudoOld School Boxing  - 100 years of The JabDan Mendoza, Champion of Ireland?Too much emphasis is placed on GroundfightingCan Martial Arts be good and bad at the same time?Should ground wrestling be abolished?This 17th Century Technique Was Banned — But I Found ItWhy Im not giving up on HEMA just yetThe History of English Martial Arts pt1Stories of Greatness - The Man Who SAVED BOXINGUK Self Defence Laws for Martial ArtistsWRESTLER REACTS - Stopped streetfight
EnglishMartialArts |

BJJ Is Basically Just Judo

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER