BI 138 Matthew Larkum: The Dendrite Hypothesis @braininspired
BI 138 Matthew Larkum: The Dendrite Hypothesis  @braininspired
Uploaded June 2022 | Updated September 2026, 3 hours ago
Patreon for full episodes and Discord community:
patreon.com/braininspired

Free Video Series: Open Questions in AI and Neuroscience:
braininspired.co/open

Apple podcasts: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/brain-inspired/id1428880766?mt=2
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2UZj8c8Ap5oc2gh2rJxLLe

Music by: The New Year: thenewyear.net

Show notes: braininspired.co/podcast/138

Matthew Larkum runs his lab at Humboldt University of Berlin, where his group studies how dendrites contribute to  computations within and across layers of the neocortex. Since the late 1990s, Matthew has continued to uncover key properties of the way pyramidal neurons stretch across layers of the cortex, their dendrites receiving inputs from those different layers - and thus different brain areas. For example, layer 5 pyramidal neurons have a set of basal dendrites near the cell body that receives feedforward-like input, and a set of apical dendrites all the way up in layer 1 that receives feedback--like input. Depending on which set of dendrites is receiving input, or neither or both, the neuron's output functions in different modes- silent, regular spiking, or burst spiking. Matthew realized the different sets of dendritic inputs could signal different operations, often pairing feedforward sensory--like signals and feedback context-like signals. His research has shown this kind of coincidence detection is important for cognitive functions like perception, memory, learning, and even wakefulness. We discuss many of his ideas and research findings, why dendrites have long been neglected in favor of neuron cell bodies, the possibility of learning about computations by studying implementation-level phenomena, and much more.

0:00 - Intro
5:31 - Background: Dendrites
23:20 - Cortical neuron bodies vs. branches
25:47 - Theories of cortex
30:49 - Feedforward and feedback hierarchy
37:40 - Dendritic integration hypothesis
44:32 - DIT vs. other consciousness theories
51:30 - Mac Shine Q1
1:04:38 - Are dendrites conceptually useful?
1:09:15 - Insights from implementation level
1:24:44 - How detailed to model?
1:28:15 - Do action potentials cause consciousness?
1:40:33 - Mac Shine Q2
BI 138 Matthew Larkum: The Dendrite HypothesisDefining Complexity ScienceBI 143 Rodolphe Sepulchre: Mixed Feedback ControlAI Lack of Temporal PerceptionSleep Supercharges LearningBI 132 Ila Fiete: A Grid Scaffold for MemoryCognitive vs Sensory ProcessingBI 196 Cristina Savin and Tim Vogels with Gaute Einevoll and Mikkel LepperødBI 123 Irina Rish: Continual LearningBI 183 Dan Goodman: Neural ReckoningBI 217 Jennifer Prendki: Consciousness, Life, AI, and Quantum PhysicsBI 175 Kevin Mitchell: Free Agents
Brain Inspired |

BI 138 Matthew Larkum: The Dendrite Hypothesis

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER