Uploaded July 2010 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.
This is a video made in response to a troll's claims about Berlinski and the Dishonesty Institute. I outline the Dishonesty Institute's aims, from their own material, the Wedge Document, and various Dishonesty Institute videos released over the years. I demonstrate, as others have done over the years, the dishonest tactics outlined by so-called "Intelligent Design" proponents, and why ID is nothing more than re-branded Creationism.
References for all claims made in this video series (I've referenced Wikipedia because the original sources from the Wiki articles themselves are too lengthy for this video info bar, but if you do the non-lazy thing of looking at the references on the wiki pages themselves you'll see them all):
Intelligent Design Movement: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_movement retrieved 2010-07-24
Discovery Institute: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Institute retrieved 2010-07-24
Wedge Strategy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy retrieved 2010-07-23
Jonathan Wells: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Wells_(intelligent_design_advocate) retrieved 2010-07-26
David Berlinski: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Berlinski retrieved 2010-07-26
The Wedge Document (scanned): antievolution.org/features/wedge.pdf retrieved 2010-07-26
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.
This is a video made in response to a troll's claims about Berlinski and the Dishonesty Institute. I outline the Dishonesty Institute's aims, from their own material, the Wedge Document, and various Dishonesty Institute videos released over the years. I demonstrate, as others have done over the years, the dishonest tactics outlined by so-called "Intelligent Design" proponents, and why ID is nothing more than re-branded Creationism.
References for all claims made in this video series (I've referenced Wikipedia because the original sources from the Wiki articles themselves are too lengthy for this video info bar, but if you do the non-lazy thing of looking at the references on the wiki pages themselves you'll see them all):
Intelligent Design Movement: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_movement retrieved 2010-07-24
Discovery Institute: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Institute retrieved 2010-07-24
Wedge Strategy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy retrieved 2010-07-23
Jonathan Wells: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Wells_(intelligent_design_advocate) retrieved 2010-07-26
David Berlinski: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Berlinski retrieved 2010-07-26
The Wedge Document (scanned): antievolution.org/features/wedge.pdf retrieved 2010-07-26







![Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 1
Update: More information at the end of the video description.
Comment approval now removed. You are free to comment as you wish. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:
Im citing Fair Use under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf
Also Fair Dealing under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.
This is the first part of my critical analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know?! Down The Rabbit Hole. Details in the video itself.
EXTENDED REFERENCES:
Revelation:
[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252
[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith
[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence
[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith
[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith
[f] Dictionary.com. Eastons 1897 Bible Dictionary. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)
A note about Fred Wolfs qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.
A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Critical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 1](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Jvy0mh0el4s/mqdefault.jpg)


