Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
To illustrate this more clearly, let us return once again to the analogy of a pot of milk on a hot stove. If you place a layer of thermal insulation between the burner and the pot, it will slow the transfer of heat, causing the boiling process to unfold far more gradually. But if you remove that protective barrier, the full energy of the burner will act directly on the pot, triggering rapid and uncontrollable boiling.
The same principle applies here: the equipment could not eliminate all risks of natural disasters, but it made the development of catastrophic events more restrained, buying precious time for humanity.
The effectiveness of this protective screen is supported by statistical data from publicly available sources, which I have referenced in my previous addresses. The evidence of the equipment’s impact is irrefutable.
In August 2023, following the designation of the ALLATRA movement as “undesirable” in Russia, the experimental protective equipment was dismantled and removed from the country.
And on September 3, we issued a warning: This decision was one of the gravest mistakes humanity could make, and it would lead to severe consequences—not only for Russia but for the entire world.
We then stated that the first adverse effects would begin to emerge within 3 to 4 months and that the full scope of consequences would become apparent within 6 to 9 months after the equipment's removal.
The consequences did not take long to appear. From August 10 through November 2023, there was an unprecedented surge in both the number and intensity of climate-related disasters in Russia and Eastern Europe. The data reveals a cascading pattern of calamities—each disaster following the next with increasing force, a progression that had never before been observed.
As I have already stated in my previous addresses, the economic consequences of turning off the equipment have been catastrophic. For example, six significant weather anomalies that occurred after the system was shut down caused Russia more damage than the country suffered from natural disasters in any single year since 2012.
And I would like to emphasize that all losses incurred by Russia—and by the rest of the world—following the deactivation of this experimental equipment should be legally claimed from the extremist organization RACIRS and its leader, Alexander Dvorkin. That would be just.
To illustrate this more clearly, let us return once again to the analogy of a pot of milk on a hot stove. If you place a layer of thermal insulation between the burner and the pot, it will slow the transfer of heat, causing the boiling process to unfold far more gradually. But if you remove that protective barrier, the full energy of the burner will act directly on the pot, triggering rapid and uncontrollable boiling.
The same principle applies here: the equipment could not eliminate all risks of natural disasters, but it made the development of catastrophic events more restrained, buying precious time for humanity.
The effectiveness of this protective screen is supported by statistical data from publicly available sources, which I have referenced in my previous addresses. The evidence of the equipment’s impact is irrefutable.
In August 2023, following the designation of the ALLATRA movement as “undesirable” in Russia, the experimental protective equipment was dismantled and removed from the country.
And on September 3, we issued a warning: This decision was one of the gravest mistakes humanity could make, and it would lead to severe consequences—not only for Russia but for the entire world.
We then stated that the first adverse effects would begin to emerge within 3 to 4 months and that the full scope of consequences would become apparent within 6 to 9 months after the equipment's removal.
The consequences did not take long to appear. From August 10 through November 2023, there was an unprecedented surge in both the number and intensity of climate-related disasters in Russia and Eastern Europe. The data reveals a cascading pattern of calamities—each disaster following the next with increasing force, a progression that had never before been observed.
As I have already stated in my previous addresses, the economic consequences of turning off the equipment have been catastrophic. For example, six significant weather anomalies that occurred after the system was shut down caused Russia more damage than the country suffered from natural disasters in any single year since 2012.
And I would like to emphasize that all losses incurred by Russia—and by the rest of the world—following the deactivation of this experimental equipment should be legally claimed from the extremist organization RACIRS and its leader, Alexander Dvorkin. That would be just.
