Trinity Radio | ATHEIST VS CHRISTIAN: This is a DODGE @BraxtonHunter | Uploaded 5 months ago | Updated 6 hours ago
Matt Dillahunty seems to dodge the simple and direct question of whether he affirms determinism (opting instead for, "I don't know how one could show something wasn't determined"). If he affirms determinism, Matt then must argue in favor of determinism because he would be making a claim and have a burden of proof. By saying he just doesn't know, and doesn't know how someone would demonstrate it, Matt avoids the burden of proof to argue in favor of a position
Matt Dillahunty seems to dodge the simple and direct question of whether he affirms determinism (opting instead for, "I don't know how one could show something wasn't determined"). If he affirms determinism, Matt then must argue in favor of determinism because he would be making a claim and have a burden of proof. By saying he just doesn't know, and doesn't know how someone would demonstrate it, Matt avoids the burden of proof to argue in favor of a position
