Deconverted Man | Atheist Experience puts out a bad argument!? :O @DeconvertedMan | Uploaded 7 months ago | Updated 2 minutes ago
OV: youtube.com/shorts/kXaFj28kCCc
Broken argument is broken no matter who makes it or if you agree with the conclusion or not. If your argument is broken. I'm going to say its broken.

#atheistexperience #atheist #logic #skeptic

They said in this "short" the following:

p1: If Christianity is true, then a perfect being exists.
p2: If a perfect being exists Christianity is not true.
c: Therefor Christianity is false.
~~~
IF (X) then (Z)
(Z) therefor not (X).
Therefor not (X).
~~
This... is a broken argument. (Excluded middle/false dichotomy)
~~
You will see my make the error several times in my video of saying the letters wrong because I wrote the darn thing out wrong - once I saw that I fixed it mid video! Its okay to make errors and fix them! And admit when you are wrong! :D Learning! Yay!
~~~~~
My argument:

p1: A perfect being would not commit logical fallacies, in order to exist the god of the bible must be a perfect being.
p2: The god of the bible commits at least one logical fallacy of ad baculum. ((hell)
c: The god of the bible does not exist.

You could also rephrase this:

p1: The god of the bible is said to be a perfect being, and a perfect being would not perform any logical fallacies.
p2: The god of the bible comments at least 1 logical fallacy of ad baculum via "hell".
c: The god of the bible is not a perfect being.

p1: (X) is true then (Z) is true.
p2: (Z) is not true.
c: (X) must not be true.
~~~~

Also if you need more proof that his argument is broken it requires you to accept that a perfect being exists.

Woooops!