PBS Infinite Series | Arrow's Impossibility Theorem | Infinite Series @pbsinfiniteseries | Uploaded 7 years ago | Updated 3 hours ago
Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you đ) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/donateinfi
The bizarre Arrowâs Impossibility Theorem, or Arrowâs Paradox, shows a counterintuitive relationship between fair voting procedures and dictatorships. Start your free trial with Squarespace at http://squarespace.com/infiniteseries and enter offer code âinfiniteâ to get 10% off your first purchase.
Tweet at us! @pbsinfinite
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsinfinite series
Email us! pbsinfiniteseries [at] gmail [dot] com
Previous Episode
Voting Systems and the Condorcet Criterion
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ
Written and Hosted by Kelsey Houston-Edwards
Produced by Rusty Ward
Graphics by Ray Lux
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Additional Resources
Networks, Crowds and Markets:: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/
Original Paper by Kenneth Arrow:: web.archive.org/web/20110720090207/http://gatton.uky.edu/Faculty/hoytw/751/articles/arrow.pdf
Different voting systems can produce radically different election results, so itâs important to ensure the voting system weâre using has certain properties - that it fairly represents the opinions of the electorates. The impressively counterintuitive Arrowâs Impossibility Theorem demonstrates that this is much harder than you might think.
Thanks: Ben Houston-Edwards and Iian Smythe
Comments answered by Kelsey:
Johan Richter
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ&lc=z12bt1nabyievh4yg04chlvpdnisxnw5rx00k
Nat Tuck
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ&lc=z12tetkx1wzocn2ue23wzdfg5sn2dhhh004
Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you đ) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: to.pbs.org/donateinfi
The bizarre Arrowâs Impossibility Theorem, or Arrowâs Paradox, shows a counterintuitive relationship between fair voting procedures and dictatorships. Start your free trial with Squarespace at http://squarespace.com/infiniteseries and enter offer code âinfiniteâ to get 10% off your first purchase.
Tweet at us! @pbsinfinite
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsinfinite series
Email us! pbsinfiniteseries [at] gmail [dot] com
Previous Episode
Voting Systems and the Condorcet Criterion
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ
Written and Hosted by Kelsey Houston-Edwards
Produced by Rusty Ward
Graphics by Ray Lux
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Additional Resources
Networks, Crowds and Markets:: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/
Original Paper by Kenneth Arrow:: web.archive.org/web/20110720090207/http://gatton.uky.edu/Faculty/hoytw/751/articles/arrow.pdf
Different voting systems can produce radically different election results, so itâs important to ensure the voting system weâre using has certain properties - that it fairly represents the opinions of the electorates. The impressively counterintuitive Arrowâs Impossibility Theorem demonstrates that this is much harder than you might think.
Thanks: Ben Houston-Edwards and Iian Smythe
Comments answered by Kelsey:
Johan Richter
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ&lc=z12bt1nabyievh4yg04chlvpdnisxnw5rx00k
Nat Tuck
youtube.com/watch?v=HoAnYQZrNrQ&lc=z12tetkx1wzocn2ue23wzdfg5sn2dhhh004