Critical Think | Antonio Subirats' field of view is entirely wrong @CriticalThink | Uploaded February 2019 | Updated October 2024, 9 hours ago.
Antonio Subirats makes another embarrassing mistake or is just plain dishonest. You can decide for yourself.
The first screen grab from Bobby's video youtu.be/XvLu5vLyQaU
The art of deception:
youtu.be/9pUXu4X5WFg
I got this out in a bit of a hurry and made a mistake in the wording at one point. The angular size of an object will remain the same at a particular distance and it will appear different size in a frame depending on focal point. That's what I demonstrated in the pictures at the end. So you cannot compare the sizes of things in a photo unless you have enough information to work out the pixels per degree and the distance to the object.
Antonio Subirats makes another embarrassing mistake or is just plain dishonest. You can decide for yourself.
The first screen grab from Bobby's video youtu.be/XvLu5vLyQaU
The art of deception:
youtu.be/9pUXu4X5WFg
I got this out in a bit of a hurry and made a mistake in the wording at one point. The angular size of an object will remain the same at a particular distance and it will appear different size in a frame depending on focal point. That's what I demonstrated in the pictures at the end. So you cannot compare the sizes of things in a photo unless you have enough information to work out the pixels per degree and the distance to the object.
