Another response to yet more Killian dishonesty. @NoToPseudoscience
Another response to yet more Killian dishonesty.  @NoToPseudoscience
Uploaded August 2011 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Yes, I know I said at the end of my last video that I would not be responding to Killian, but this part of the video was cut out of the last one so I could keep the two issues separate.

I DO intend to, at some point, make another video on the FCPA, but I don't know when. It will be an involved project which requires the relating of Public International Law to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, as well as the subject of why the FCPA does NOT cross Jurisdictional barriers.

THIS video is to make a few final points, and also to show the dishonesty that Killian will sink to.

REFERENCES:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich
Gonzalez vs Raich

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
Wickard Vs Filburn

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_international_law
Public International Law

usconstitution.net/consttop_intr.html
Constitutional Interpretation
Another response to yet more Killian dishonesty.Creationist Name & Shame Series - HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 of 2[MIRROR THIS NOW] Hospital Report Army Massacre In BharainCritical Analysis of What The Bleep Do We Know Part 2LIAR! MORON! CULTIST! STATIST! DOGMATIST! etcetc...My final video on Standard Oil, Taxation and HealthcarePopulation arguments against the mythical FloodYTDRAMA: The pathetic justifications of shanedk...RE: RE: Educating NephilimFree - Part 1 (Supplement 2b)Announcements 2009 08 09Educating NephilimFree - Part 3Something a little different...
No To Pseudoscience |

Another response to yet more Killian dishonesty.

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER