@AirCrashDaily
  @AirCrashDaily
Air Crash Daily | American Airlines Flight 965 News Reports @AirCrashDaily | Uploaded September 2024 | Updated October 2024, 10 hours ago.
Accident Description:
instagram.com/p/CmYuR9LPm7Y/?igsh=OHhvZ2p1am9wYTBu

Photos Archive:
https://x.com/aircrashdaily/status/1605177617291694080?s=19

๐—”๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—”๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—™๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฑ was a scheduled international passenger flight from Miami to Cali, operated by a Boeing 757-200 (Reg. N651AA) on ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ, ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต๐Ÿฑ.

The plane departed Miami at 18:34 EST. At 21:34, while descending to FL200, the crew contacted Cali Approach. The plane was 63nm out of Cali VOR (which is 8nm South of the airport) at the time. Cali cleared the flight for a direct Cali VOR approach and report at Tulua VOR. Followed one minute later by a clearance for a straight in VOR DME approach to runway 19 (the Rozo 1 arrival). The crew then tried to select the Rozo NDB (Non Directional Beacon) on the Flight Management Computer (FMC). Because their Jeppesen approach plates showed 'R' as the code for Rozo, the crew selected this option. But 'R' in the FMC database meant Romeo. Romeo is a navaid 150nm from Rozo, but has the same frequency.

The plane had just passed Tulua VOR when it started a turn to the left (towards Romeo). This turn caused some confusion in the cockpit since Rozo 1 was to be a straight in approach. 87 Seconds after commencing the turn, the crew activated Heading Select, which disengaged LNAV and started a right turn. The left turn brought the plane over mountainous terrain, so a Ground Proximity warning sounded. With increased engine power and nose-up the crew tried to climb. The spoilers were still activated however. The stick shaker then activated and the plane crashed into a mountain at about 8,900 feet (Cali field elevation being 3,153 feet).

๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ:
"Aeronautica Civil determines that the probable causes of this accident were:
1. The flight crew's failure to adequately plan and execute the approach to runway 19 at SKCL and their inadequate use of automation;
2. Failure of the flight crew to discontinue the approach into Cali, despite numerous cues alerting them of the inadvisability of continuing the approach;
3. The lack of situational awareness of the flight crew regarding vertical navigation, proximity to terrain, and the relative location of critical radio aids;
4. Failure of the flight crew to revert to basic radio navigation at the time when the FMS-assisted navigation became confusing and demanded an excessive workload in a critical phase of the flight.

Contributing to the cause of the accident were:
1. The flight crew's ongoing efforts to expedite their approach and landing in order to avoid potential delays;
2. The flight crew's execution of the GPWS escape manoeuvre while the speed brakes remained deployed;
3. FMS logic that dropped all intermediate fixes from the display(s) in the event of execution of a direct routing;
4. FMS-generated navigational information that used a different naming convention from that published in navigational charts."
American Airlines Flight 965 News ReportsSierra Pacific Airlines Flight 802 Aftermath FootageAtlas Air Flight 3591 ATC RecordingCSA Ceskoslovenskรฉ Aerolinie Flight 511 Aftermath FootageGaruda Indonesia Flight 152 Aftermath Footage1951 Miami Airlines C-46 (N1678M) Crash News Report & Aftermath FootageDelta Air Lines Flight 191 News ReportsDelta Air Lines Flight 191 Aftermath FootageSanta Bรกrbara Airlines Flight 518 CVR RecordingKorean Air Lines Flight 007 CVR RecordingBraniff International Airways Flight 352 CVR RecordingAmerican Airlines Flight 11 ATC Recording

American Airlines Flight 965 News Reports @AirCrashDaily

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER