Aligning LLM Evaluators with Human Annotations (using Mastra agents) @arizeai
Aligning LLM Evaluators with Human Annotations (using Mastra agents)  @arizeai
Uploaded September 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Evals are everywhere, but generic benchmarks rarely capture the nuances of your application. In this tutorial, you’ll learn how to build custom LLM evaluators that align with your specific use case by incorporating human feedback and running a clear, repeatable workflow.

Everything is implemented in TypeScript, with code examples.

Code: arize.com/docs/phoenix/cookbook/human-in-the-loop-workflows-annotations/aligning-llm-evals-with-human-annotations-typescript
Phoenix: arize.com/docs/phoenix
Community: arize.com/community
Aligning LLM Evaluators with Human Annotations (using Mastra agents)LLM as a Judge 102: Meta EvaluationFrom AI Coding Agents to the Software Factory | Factory AI | Arize Observe 2026One AI Question - why do you use an LLM to evaluate another LLM with Ankur DuggalWhen AI Can Write Code, What Are Software Engineers Worth? | CitadelOne AI Question - how is marketing at Arize using AI, with Chris CooningSalesforce - Monitoring, Analyzing, and Improving Multi Agent ImplementationSource Allies - Generative AI Agents Jack of All Trades or Master of OneWhy Your LLM Starts Forgetting InstructionsThe Emerging Stack for AI Compute: Kubernetes + Ray + PyTorch + vLLMIntroducing Strands Agents: AWS on How To Improve the Customer Experience with AI AgentsAI Agent Mastery Certification Course: Module 4 – Tools & MCP
Arize AI |

Aligning LLM Evaluators with Human Annotations (using Mastra agents)

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER