Uploaded December 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
- Composer: Alexander Nikolayevich Scriabin (6 January 1872 -- 27 April 1915)
- Performer: Vladimir Ashkenazy
- Year of recording: 1982
Piano Sonata No. 6, Op. 62, written in 1911.
One movement, marked: Modéré: Mystérieux, concentré
Although it is numbered Scriabin's sixth sonata, the sonata was preceded by the Sonata No. 7. As it is one of the late piano sonatas of Scriabin's career, the music consists of a single movement, and is almost atonal.
The mood of the piece is marked "mystérieux" by the composer, but the most striking aspect of the sixth sonata, are the sudden moments of horror which interrupt its dreamlike atmosphere, and were explicitly marked "l'épouvante surgit" (surge of terror), by Scriabin. The final passages are colourful and languid, like an elaborate Debussy prelude, but darker forces are released at the end.
It is one of a few pieces Scriabin himself never played in public, because he felt it was "nightmarish, murky, unclean and mischievous". Scriabin reportedly feared the sonata, its darkness, and considered the work to be corrupted by demonic forces. He often started shuddering after playing a few measures to other people.
- Composer: Alexander Nikolayevich Scriabin (6 January 1872 -- 27 April 1915)
- Performer: Vladimir Ashkenazy
- Year of recording: 1982
Piano Sonata No. 6, Op. 62, written in 1911.
One movement, marked: Modéré: Mystérieux, concentré
Although it is numbered Scriabin's sixth sonata, the sonata was preceded by the Sonata No. 7. As it is one of the late piano sonatas of Scriabin's career, the music consists of a single movement, and is almost atonal.
The mood of the piece is marked "mystérieux" by the composer, but the most striking aspect of the sixth sonata, are the sudden moments of horror which interrupt its dreamlike atmosphere, and were explicitly marked "l'épouvante surgit" (surge of terror), by Scriabin. The final passages are colourful and languid, like an elaborate Debussy prelude, but darker forces are released at the end.
It is one of a few pieces Scriabin himself never played in public, because he felt it was "nightmarish, murky, unclean and mischievous". Scriabin reportedly feared the sonata, its darkness, and considered the work to be corrupted by demonic forces. He often started shuddering after playing a few measures to other people.

![Xaver Scharwenka - Piano Concerto No. 1 in B flat minor, Op. 32
- Composer: Franz Xaver Scharwenka (6 January 1850 8 December 1924)
- Orchestra: Estonian National Symphony Orchestra
- Conductor: Neeme Järvi
- Soloist: Alexander Markovich
- Year of recording: 2013
Piano Concerto No. 1 in B flat minor, Op. 32, written in 1876.
00:00 - I. Allegro Patetico
10:44 - II. Allegro assai
17:53 - III. Allegro non tanto
Scharwenkas 1st Piano Concerto in B flat minor (1876) brought Scharwenka great renown. It is dedicated to Liszt, for whom Scharwenka performed it privately. The gestation of the work was not simple. It began life as a two-movement Fantasy for solo piano and Scharwenka worked on it for several years from the early 1870s before it reached its final shape. In three movements, the result is a seemingly conventional structure, yet the content reflects its origins as a solo fantasia. It is famously the only (or perhaps one of the few) concertos that features 3 allegro movements consecutively.
Scharwenka often performed this concerto to great success in programs that also included Beethovens Emperor concerto. Hans von Bülow called it original, amiable throughout, perfect in form... [with] admirable intrumentation. Such illustrious pianists as Constantin von Sternberg, Emil von Sauer, Moriz Rosenthal, and Eugen dAlbert had this concerto in their repertory. But it was missing for many decades, until Earl Wild revived the concerto in 1968, and made the first recording of it.
- The stirring opening tutti is cut short by the piano, which wrests the spotlight from the orchestra, and so it remains. What then emerges, rather than a contest, is a constantly evolving elaboration not only on the initial theme but also on more lyrical and introverted ideas, interspersed with moments of bravura. This became a feature of later concertos too. Of particular note is the wistful tone of the Adagio section, introduced by strings, the melody given to the violas.
- As much of the first movement is in reflective mood, it is not surprising that Scharwenka replaces the traditional slow movement with a Scherzo. Its main theme cross-fertilises the triple metre with duple phrasing and the second theme has a simple but beguiling tripping rhythm. The movement shows the strong influence of the style brillant, recalling composers such as Hummel and Chopin, while elsewhere in the concerto parallels may be drawn with Liszt and Grieg.
- It is in the finale that the elements of the fantasia are most pronounced: a mysterious, expectant orchestral opening, a solo peroration ending with a brief allusion to the viola theme from the first movement, echoed by the clarinet. Only then is the movement fully launched, yet it becomes entranced by the recalled theme. Liszt’s cyclic principles are tempered by Scharwenka’s quasi-improvisational approach, which at last gives the soloist a designated Cadenza, marked Maestoso, which also reintroduces the work’s opening theme. A compelling coda ensues.
The piano concerto is dedicated: Franz Liszt, verehrungsvoll zugeeignet. Xaver Scharwenka - Piano Concerto No. 1 in B flat minor, Op. 32](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/a4Jou7pgSzM/mqdefault.jpg)

![Jean-Philippe Rameau - Suite in G major/minor (Nouvelles Suites de Pièces de Clavecin 1727)
- Composer: Jean-Philippe Rameau (25 September 1683 12 September 1764)
- Performer: Grigori Sokolov (piano)
- Year of recording: 1997 (Live in Bergen, Norway)
Suite in G major/minor, from Nouvelles Suites de Pièces de Clavecin, for harpsichord, written in 1727.
00:00 - Les Tricotets (Rondeau)
01:46 - LIndifférente
04:25 - Menuet
06:05 - Menuet II
08:11 - La Poule
12:27 - Les Triolets
17:00 - Les Sauvages
19:06 - LEnharmonique (Gracieusement)
25:33 - LÉgyptienne
The Nouvelles suites de pièces de clavecin includes 15 pieces. The first seven pieces of the anthology are grouped around A major and A minor [not in this recording], while the remainder are centered on G major and G minor. Like all French keyboard works, they are notable for such characteristic devices as the broken chord (stile brisé) taken over by French keyboard composers from the influential school of early seventeenth century lutenists. Also highly characteristic are the lavishly decorated melodic lines, based on a code of ornamentation illustrated in didactic prefaces by composers such as dAnglebert and Couperin. As in all three of Rameaus collections, the pieces are divided between the binary (two-part) dance movements of the Baroque suite and the character pieces unique to French instrumental music.
The present collection is headed by three dance movements: an Allemande, a Courante, and a Sarabande (worthy of special mention as one of Rameaus noblest conceptions), and also includes a Gavotte et doubles (variations) and a pair of Minuets. The descriptive character or genre pieces sometimes have intriguing titles, the original meaning of which cannot always be determined. The Nouvelles suites includes ten such pieces, among them one of the composers most famous keyboard works, LEnharmonique. It takes it name from the striking enharmonic modulation just after the start of the second half, reminding listeners that the composer was also an outstanding theorist whose Traite dharmonie (Treatise on Harmony) was one of the most influential pedagogical publications of the eighteenth century. Another popular piece here is La Poule, which graphically imitates the clucking of a hen in the most ingenious fashion. The contemporary vogue for the exotic is not ignored, either, as the inclusion of pieces entitled Les Sauvages and LÉgyptienne clearly illustrates. A number of Rameaus keyboard works were later orchestrated and reused in his operas, an example being the Sarabande, which later found its way into the third act of Zaroastre from 1749.
These pieces were originally written for the clavecimble, in this recording they are played on the grand piano by G. Sokolov; his clavecimble-like playing of these pieces on the piano shows that it can make perfect sense to play harpsichord pieces like this on the piano if theyre handled as well as they are here by Sokolov. Jean-Philippe Rameau - Suite in G major/minor (Nouvelles Suites de Pièces de Clavecin 1727)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aT15H458uoo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Willem Pijper - Six Adagios
- Composer: Willem (Frederik Willem Johannes) Pijper (8 September 1894 18 March 1947)
- Orchestra: The Residentie Orchestra
- Conductor: Eduard Flipse
- Year of recording: 1953
Six Adagios {Zes Adagios} for Orchestra, written in 1940.
00:00 - I. Grave
02:09 - II. Adagio (lento assai)
03:42 - III. Adagio (quasi un poco meno lento)
04:59 - IV. Adagio, un poco più andante
06:13 - V. Largo
07:39 - VI. Grave
Dutch composer Willem Pijper composed the Six Adagios for Orchestra for the student initiation of the Order of Freemasons, of which he was a member. Each adagio was designed as temple music for a given phase of the initiation ritual.
Given the purpose of the work, he did not utilise his usual polytonalic and polyrhythmic techniques, but returned very consciously back to the familiar tonality principle: the Adagios are in the key of C Major and C minor. Therefore, the music comes to the listener as an understandable, familiar language, richly melodic and with a gentle harmony partly due to the instrumental timbres. This piece, along with the Sex Epigrams [uploaded on this channel] show of Pijpers excellent orchestral writing skills.
The piece is recorded under the label Order of Freemasons under the Grand Orient of the Netherlands. Willem Pijper - Six Adagios](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/akCuYMGT6kI/mqdefault.jpg)





