Uploaded May 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
In this episode, Dan Chapa leads an examination of Alan Rhoda’s philosophical defense of open theism, especially his claims about alethic openness, Peircean vs. Ockhamist semantics, and whether statements like “Alexander will invade Persia” can be true before the event happens.
In this episode, Dan Chapa leads an examination of Alan Rhoda’s philosophical defense of open theism, especially his claims about alethic openness, Peircean vs. Ockhamist semantics, and whether statements like “Alexander will invade Persia” can be true before the event happens.
