dprjones | Advice and a challenge for 9/11 "truthers" @dprjones | Uploaded April 2010 | Updated October 2024, 9 hours ago.
My offer to 9/11 "truthers" is this;
I will debunk any claim that you seek to advance, provided that it meets the following criteria;
a) it relates to and supports the theory that the US Government was complicit in 9/11; and
b) the claim is supported by cited references and is verifiable.
Criteria (a) is to prevent people expecting me to respond to allegations such as "the moon is made of cheese".
Criteria (b) means that I do not have to do your homework for you. If you make a statement then you should be able to back it up with evidence. (Co-incidence and hearsay do not necessarily amount to evidence.) Nor will I respond to comments such as "Don't you think that it is odd that ...?" or "It's too much of a co-incidence that ...."
For example, I will not respond to comments such as "I've [heard from a friend that]/[I saw on a video that] thermite was found in the debris".
But I will respond to "In a report by [person] published in [publication] a source for which is [source/URL/reference] in which it is stated that thermite was found in the debris ... etc etc".
Also, I will not respond to people who simply cite a youtube video and ask "what do you think of that?" or "how do you explain that?"
You can either PM me or make a video response.
I would like to thank nykytyne2 and dannypantsgm for their generous contributions.
youtube.com/user/dannypantsgm
youtube.com/user/Nykytyne2
My offer to 9/11 "truthers" is this;
I will debunk any claim that you seek to advance, provided that it meets the following criteria;
a) it relates to and supports the theory that the US Government was complicit in 9/11; and
b) the claim is supported by cited references and is verifiable.
Criteria (a) is to prevent people expecting me to respond to allegations such as "the moon is made of cheese".
Criteria (b) means that I do not have to do your homework for you. If you make a statement then you should be able to back it up with evidence. (Co-incidence and hearsay do not necessarily amount to evidence.) Nor will I respond to comments such as "Don't you think that it is odd that ...?" or "It's too much of a co-incidence that ...."
For example, I will not respond to comments such as "I've [heard from a friend that]/[I saw on a video that] thermite was found in the debris".
But I will respond to "In a report by [person] published in [publication] a source for which is [source/URL/reference] in which it is stated that thermite was found in the debris ... etc etc".
Also, I will not respond to people who simply cite a youtube video and ask "what do you think of that?" or "how do you explain that?"
You can either PM me or make a video response.
I would like to thank nykytyne2 and dannypantsgm for their generous contributions.
youtube.com/user/dannypantsgm
youtube.com/user/Nykytyne2
