Adam and Eve did not live 200,000 years ago @biblicalgenetics8838
Adam and Eve did not live 200,000 years ago  @biblicalgenetics8838
Uploaded August 2022 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Dr Rob explains an issue in the creation vs. evolution debate: how fast mutations accumulate. The rate we can measure in families (the 'genealogical' rate) is much faster than the rate at which it is claimed mutations accumulate in the population (the 'phylogenetic' rate). There are good reasons why the genealogical rate is closer to the real value we should use to date Adam and Eve, including the fact that most mutations are selectively neutral and, therefore, accumulate at the rate at which the occur. Yes, natural selection can remove some mutations. Thus, the long-term mutation rate is a little slower than the genealogical mutation rate, but the difference is a few percent, not two orders of magnitude.

There are several charts shown in this presentation that are part of a project that Dr Rob is currently working on. You can access those charts in the show notes here:

biblicalgenetics.com/Adam-Eve-Recent

Would you like to help support Biblical Genetics? It's easy!
One time: buymeacoffee.com/BibGenetics
Monthly: Patreon.com/BiblicalGenetics
Adam and Eve did not live 200,000 years agoCan creationists explain Neanderthals?Human vs Chimp Part 3: a deep dive into how statistics are being misusedMendels Law of Exponential Trait CombinationsIntroduction to Biblical Genealogy: Ancestor Trees vs Descendant TreesThe incredible shrinking human genomeWhy would anyone assume everything stays the same? (rates of change in biology)Natural Selection  Not a Friend of EvolutionHow functional is the human genome? Part 1Placing the sons of Noah on the Y chromosome treeEvolutions Wobbly FoundationGeeking out about DNA damage repair (repair your DNA or die)
Biblical Genetics |

Adam and Eve did not live 200,000 years ago

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER