Accounting for AI — a Comparison of Methods @BKCHarvard
Accounting for AI — a Comparison of Methods  @BKCHarvard
Uploaded November 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
A few years ago, Finale Doshi-Velez and Mason Kortz – and a squad of collaborators – unpacked explanation as one way to hold AI systems accountable. Many frameworks for AI regulation and best practices have since emerged.

In this conversation, Finale and Mason returned to the question of accountability and regulation for AI: What are the options for regulating AI systems in real-world settings? What are the advantages of ex-ante and ex-post monitoring? What roles should different methods of accountability play? How do we strategically use each one?

They reflected on how their views have evolved and considered some ways forward.
Accounting for AI — a Comparison of MethodsRSM Assembly Fellowship Information SessionMeme Wars / Black Skinhead Book TalkCyber security and resilience: Lessons from UkraineThe Future of Online Lending: A Discussion of Controlled Digital Lending and HachetteArtificial General Intelligences Five Hard National Security ProblemsTwo Geniuses Walk into a Zoom:  A Conversation with Tressie McMillan Cottom & Mary L. GrayMeet the Digital Trade and Data Governance HubThe Future of Social Media Transparency - Brandon SilvermanCOVID-19 from the Margins: Pandemic Invisibilities, Policies, and Resistance in the Datafied SocietyRetrospective Contact Tracing: How States Can Investigate Covid-19 ClustersThe Quantified Worker
The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society |

Accounting for AI — a Comparison of Methods

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER