Uploaded May 2016 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
How Injunctions Against Intermediaries Change Intermediary Liability in Europe
In Europe, even law abiding Internet intermediaries can be sued in private lawsuits by intellectual property right holders in order to provide them with some 'extra assistance' in enforcement of their rights. The law increasingly forces intermediaries to work for the right owners by making them accountable even if they are not (tortiously) liable for actions of their users. Thus even intermediaries who diligently deal with illegitimate content on their services can be still subject to a forced cooperation to a benefit of right holders, such as website-blocking or subscriber-disconnections. This talk explores how this novel entitlement of right holders, which is being gradually exported also outside of the EU, impacts traditional allocation of liability under tort-law, human rights of third parties and future innovation.
Martin Husovec is an Assistant Professor at the University of Tilburg (Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society & Tilburg Law and Economics Center). He is also a IMPRS-CI Doctoral Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet & Society (CIS) and Impact Litigator at European Information Society Institute (EISi), an independent non-profit organization based in Slovakia focusing on the overlap of technology, law & society.
Martin maintains a well-known blog - Huťko´s Technology Law Blog - devoted to technology, internet law, copyright & industrial rights in the European Union. He is an author of a leading open access book on intermediary liability law in Slovakia and Czech republic. His scholarship previously appeared in the journals such as JIPITEC, JIPLP and IIC and includes papers: "The End of (Meta) Search Engines in Europe?", "Injunctions Against Innocent Third Parties: Case of Website Blocking" and "Much Ado About Little: Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions" (co-authored). In the field of intermediary liability research, he cooperates internationally as a member of the Takedown Project of UC Berkeley Law and the American Assembly, and the The World Intermediary Liability Map (WILMap) of CIS.
His work within EISi was instrumental in several strategic litigations in Europe. Martin authored numerous amicus curiae briefs related to copyright and Internet policy before the Slovak and Czech courts, a constitutional review of the data retention laws before the Slovak Constitutional Court and an intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in a landmark intermediary liability case - Delfi AS v. Estonia.
Martin also advises the Slovak Industrial Property Office on the issues of Internet enforcement and is a member of the European Commission Expert Group on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights.
How Injunctions Against Intermediaries Change Intermediary Liability in Europe
In Europe, even law abiding Internet intermediaries can be sued in private lawsuits by intellectual property right holders in order to provide them with some 'extra assistance' in enforcement of their rights. The law increasingly forces intermediaries to work for the right owners by making them accountable even if they are not (tortiously) liable for actions of their users. Thus even intermediaries who diligently deal with illegitimate content on their services can be still subject to a forced cooperation to a benefit of right holders, such as website-blocking or subscriber-disconnections. This talk explores how this novel entitlement of right holders, which is being gradually exported also outside of the EU, impacts traditional allocation of liability under tort-law, human rights of third parties and future innovation.
Martin Husovec is an Assistant Professor at the University of Tilburg (Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society & Tilburg Law and Economics Center). He is also a IMPRS-CI Doctoral Research Fellow at Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet & Society (CIS) and Impact Litigator at European Information Society Institute (EISi), an independent non-profit organization based in Slovakia focusing on the overlap of technology, law & society.
Martin maintains a well-known blog - Huťko´s Technology Law Blog - devoted to technology, internet law, copyright & industrial rights in the European Union. He is an author of a leading open access book on intermediary liability law in Slovakia and Czech republic. His scholarship previously appeared in the journals such as JIPITEC, JIPLP and IIC and includes papers: "The End of (Meta) Search Engines in Europe?", "Injunctions Against Innocent Third Parties: Case of Website Blocking" and "Much Ado About Little: Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions" (co-authored). In the field of intermediary liability research, he cooperates internationally as a member of the Takedown Project of UC Berkeley Law and the American Assembly, and the The World Intermediary Liability Map (WILMap) of CIS.
His work within EISi was instrumental in several strategic litigations in Europe. Martin authored numerous amicus curiae briefs related to copyright and Internet policy before the Slovak and Czech courts, a constitutional review of the data retention laws before the Slovak Constitutional Court and an intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in a landmark intermediary liability case - Delfi AS v. Estonia.
Martin also advises the Slovak Industrial Property Office on the issues of Internet enforcement and is a member of the European Commission Expert Group on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights.










![Browsing with Tor: Online Anonymity to Outsmart the NSA - Tom Lowenthal
CIS Tech Workshop with Tom Lowenthal - Browsing with Tor: Online Anonymity to Outsmart the NSA
https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/events/cis-tech-workshop-tom-lowenthal-browsing-tor-online-anonymity-outsmart-nsa
In the NSAs Tor Stinks presentation, they call Tor the king of high-secure [sic] low-latency Internet anonymity with no contenders for the throne in waiting, and admit that even with their vast resources and massive data-centers, even the NSA can only effectively attack a tiny fraction of Tor users at once. In this workshop, Tom Lowenthal formerly of the Tor Project taught us how to use Tor to browse the web safely. He taught a little about how Tor works, and what Tor can and cant protect against. Audience members were encouraged to bring their laptops: this was a hands-on session. You should walk away with Tor installed, and confident you can use it safely. This session was open to folks of all experience levels.
Tom Lowenthal is a technologist and an activist who specializes in operational security and grassroots surveillance self-defense. A year ago, his opinions on computer security sounded over-the-top, but now they barely seem adequate. He believes strongly in individual privacy & personal freedom and tries to avoid making eye contact with security cameras., which doesnt work nearly as well as it sounds. Tom works to improve the state of usable liberations technologies and teach at-risk users about the steps they can take to be safe. He previously worked as a paranoia advocate at Mozilla, and the Tor Projects coordinator. He holds a B.A. in Political Theory with Computer Science and Technology Policy from Princeton University. You can harangue him on Twitter @flamsmark, or find other contact info at tomlowenthal.com. Browsing with Tor: Online Anonymity to Outsmart the NSA - Tom Lowenthal](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ij7nqNJ0Yhw/mqdefault.jpg)