Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The Importance of the Septuagint in Biblical Translation: An Interview with Missionary Adam Boyd
In this fascinating interview, Steven welcomes Adam Boyd, a missionary and Bible translator, to discuss the significant differences between the Septuagint and Masoretic texts. Boyd shares his experiences translating the Bible for the Enga people in Papua New Guinea and provides insights into the importance of the Septuagint in textual criticism and biblical translation. The discussion covers examples where the Septuagint might preserve more accurate readings, challenges with the Masoretic text, and the implications for translators today. Boyd also reflects on the preservation of scripture and offers practical insights for those interested in textual criticism.
00:00 A Bible Translator
04:40 Should we ever prefer the Septuagint over the Hebrew Bible?
14:02 Understanding the Byzantine Text and Septuagint Manuscripts
14:46 Challenges in Finding Complete Septuagint Manuscripts
15:23 Comparing New Testament and Septuagint Manuscript Availability
15:47 The Role of Major Manuscripts in Septuagint Studies
16:07 Exploring the Concept of a Byzantine Text in the Septuagint
21:24 The Value of the Septuagint in Early Christianity
22:41 Jesus and the Apostles' Use of the Septuagint
23:42 The Importance of the Septuagint for Modern Translators
27:17 Personal Reflections on Textual Criticism and Faith
Text Critical English New Testament:
amazon.com/Text-Critical-English-New-Testament-Byzantine/dp/B0BCCVSJMQ/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&dib_tag=se&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.8V0gyboLNsSApqsmb0R9UXo5cUOk-jONusEBLb_KXM3bXLhDuKKOpNKkwB-c0AmtEf0wStyzQfpfi4V_oVcxkoz1herTqEr94zFFw_eDE1j4uJCbNcWQj2llAbxelAW7bTz-zdq06A18U1Ey2TZZwYfhKyy8ayNkfv_vkBNeLOtcGvFHCOWXNqNcbO100Os1WkjOqoSy-k3sCpvQUPgrZ9skzfaKDlfUqwVRL3Ig8ak.U0hV3gO6-l63alvJFu6AhpdZVjmhD1QNaI0EQL3WCgk&qid=1762480511&sr=8-1
The Importance of the Septuagint in Biblical Translation: An Interview with Missionary Adam Boyd
In this fascinating interview, Steven welcomes Adam Boyd, a missionary and Bible translator, to discuss the significant differences between the Septuagint and Masoretic texts. Boyd shares his experiences translating the Bible for the Enga people in Papua New Guinea and provides insights into the importance of the Septuagint in textual criticism and biblical translation. The discussion covers examples where the Septuagint might preserve more accurate readings, challenges with the Masoretic text, and the implications for translators today. Boyd also reflects on the preservation of scripture and offers practical insights for those interested in textual criticism.
00:00 A Bible Translator
04:40 Should we ever prefer the Septuagint over the Hebrew Bible?
14:02 Understanding the Byzantine Text and Septuagint Manuscripts
14:46 Challenges in Finding Complete Septuagint Manuscripts
15:23 Comparing New Testament and Septuagint Manuscript Availability
15:47 The Role of Major Manuscripts in Septuagint Studies
16:07 Exploring the Concept of a Byzantine Text in the Septuagint
21:24 The Value of the Septuagint in Early Christianity
22:41 Jesus and the Apostles' Use of the Septuagint
23:42 The Importance of the Septuagint for Modern Translators
27:17 Personal Reflections on Textual Criticism and Faith
Text Critical English New Testament:
amazon.com/Text-Critical-English-New-Testament-Byzantine/dp/B0BCCVSJMQ/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&dib_tag=se&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.8V0gyboLNsSApqsmb0R9UXo5cUOk-jONusEBLb_KXM3bXLhDuKKOpNKkwB-c0AmtEf0wStyzQfpfi4V_oVcxkoz1herTqEr94zFFw_eDE1j4uJCbNcWQj2llAbxelAW7bTz-zdq06A18U1Ey2TZZwYfhKyy8ayNkfv_vkBNeLOtcGvFHCOWXNqNcbO100Os1WkjOqoSy-k3sCpvQUPgrZ9skzfaKDlfUqwVRL3Ig8ak.U0hV3gO6-l63alvJFu6AhpdZVjmhD1QNaI0EQL3WCgk&qid=1762480511&sr=8-1





![What I Discovered About the Dead Sea Scrolls Blew My Mind!
Septuagint: In my previous video, we uncovered some jaw-dropping agreements between the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Septuagint, sparking widespread interest and discussion. Little did I know, that was only the beginning. Since then, Ive discovered over 72 additional alignments-minor on their own but extraordinary when viewed together. These connections reveal a stunning pattern that reshapes how we understand the relationship between these ancient texts.
In this video, well explore standout examples that illuminate this pattern, including a variant in 1 Samuel 1:24 that changed how Ive viewed a familiar verse for years. Well also dive into fascinating details from Isaiah 49:17 and Hosea 14:2, showing how the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Septuagint often converge against the Masoretic Text, sometimes in ways that modern translations reflect.
Stay with me as I reveal the entire list of alignments and share how you can download it for FREE. These variants might seem small, but they collectively point to something big. Lets dive in and uncover the hidden gems in the Septuagint and Dead Sea Scrolls!
Helpful book on the LXX: https://amzn.to/4eRFcVS
Video on Dead Sea Scrolls and Septuagint: https://youtu.be/GPNLJdgfrfE
To find out which is more reliable the Hebrew Bible or LXX click here: https://youtu.be/-lfYfPM5Ulg?si=6LxQahpy4lVaUYZy
If you have already signed up for my mailing list you will find a link for the document mentioned in my video in your inbox.
My landing page: https://mailchi.mp/2f83838c05df/biblical-studies-and-reviews
Correction – Hosea 14:2 (DSS evidence)
In this video, I stated that the Dead Sea Scrolls support the Septuagint’s “fruit of lips” reading in Hosea 14:2. My source (I thought!) for that was The Lexham Textual Notes on the Bible (Brannan & Loken), which says:
The Hebrew reads “bulls” in place of “fruit,” with the resultant idea, “we will offer our lips as [sacrificial] bulls,” the reading supported by the DSS, LXX, and Syr.
This comment seems confused. The Syriac and the LXX support “fruit,” not “bulls.” After further investigation, I found that we have only one DSS manuscript covering this passage—4Q78 (4QXIIᶜ)—and it is slightly defective at this exact point. The preserved consonants match the Masoretic פרים (“bulls/calves”), but because DSS manuscripts lack vowel points, it could, in theory, be read as פְּרִים (“fruit”) with the final ם functioning as an archaic Canaanite enclitic mem rather than a plural ending. This is the understanding reflected in the LXX (καρπὸν χειλέων) and Syriac. However, the scroll itself does not clearly preserve “fruit,” so my original statement overstated the evidence.
For an example of the scholarly discussion on the enclitic mem and the “fruit” reading, see Hans Walter Wolff, Hosea: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Hosea (Hermeneia; Fortress Press, 1974), on Hosea 14:2. What I Discovered About the Dead Sea Scrolls Blew My Mind!](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EkRYMTJl3to/mqdefault.jpg)




