Uploaded May 2008 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
This video is in response to these two videos by Captain Pengies Sparrow:
youtube.com/watch?v=zN2p-PvWbp0
youtube.com/watch?v=LOzb6_96MyY
Captain Pengies states that someone called the police and pretended to be him. The caller claimed that he was holding a gun to his own head and that he was holding his son hostage. As a result of this call, the police rushed to Pengies' old address thinking they were entering a hostage situation. I believe Captain Pengies is telling us the truth and someone did try to take the drama into real life. This reckless action must be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Captain Pengies believes that it was someone from Anonymous who did this, though he admitted it could be someone who had nothing to do with the those who are going after the Church of Scientology
Captain Pengies also mocked Anonymous because they have not been able to turn out massive crowds to protest against Scientology and because they have been ineffective. He also welcomed the leaders of Anonymous to get in touch with him.
The fact that Captain Pengies referred to the leaders of Anonymous indicates that he does not have a good grasp of the situation. Anonymous has no leaders. There is also some disagreement within Anonymous as to the tactics to be used against the Church. Anonymous is not a solid monolith as Pengies might believe. It is composed of thousands of people working both independently and in loose coordination to reach its goals. This is a great video discussing the history of Anonymous:
youtube.com/watch?v=x0WCLKzDFpI
We don't know if the individual who called the police was part of Anonymous or whether he was someone who was butthurt after being powned by Pengies in the past. If he was part of Anonymous, his actions would probably be condemned by the vast majority of Anonymous. There are some bad apples within Anonymous, no doubt, as there are within any group of thousands of people. He does not represent Anonymous and whatever he did, he did not do it in the name of Anonymous.
Pengies also takes issue with Anonymous' denial of service attacks against the Church of Scientology. However, given the Church's long history of trying to destroy their critics, this was a very mild and short-lived attack against the Church. I challenge you, Captain Pengies, to do an hour or two of research about the Church and Anonymous. Captain You will then be better able to understand the atmosphere of fear and intimidation that the Church used to suppress its critics from questioning its practices. Once you understand the Church's real-life bullying—bullying that goes well beyond frivolous litigiousness, I think you will understand why I think the DOS was morally justifiable, though tactically questionable.
Here are some places for you to start your research.
My page where I make my claim that the DOS was morally justifiable:
themaskedanalyst.com/Sceintology%20and%20the%20DMCA.htm
The three women behind this next site are former members who were raised in the Church of Scientology. One of them is the niece of the leader of Scientology. She has left the Church, and is now one of their most important critics.
exscientologykids.com/admins.html
A couple of other good sites to learn about Scientology:
xenu.net
xenutv.com
Check out these videos by ToryMagoo44. She was in the Church of Scientology for roughly 30 years. She rose to the second highest level (OT7) of the Church before she left it and became a critic. Here are several videos that she made about Anonymous and the Church of Scientology that you should watch.
youtube.com/watch?v=labLPjcFrRw
youtube.com/watch?v=uZr2zQ-Eiws
youtube.com/watch?v=2J-AcPO_ru8
Of course, if you want to do a thorough evaluation of Scientology, then you will want to hear their side of the story. You can do that by visiting these sites.
scientology.org
religiousfreedomwatch.org
Finally, this is the video that redskull falsely DMCAd to get me suspended.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtKXb2...
Does Thepiratesguild really want to associate with someone who makes death threats and commits perjury?
This video is in response to these two videos by Captain Pengies Sparrow:
youtube.com/watch?v=zN2p-PvWbp0
youtube.com/watch?v=LOzb6_96MyY
Captain Pengies states that someone called the police and pretended to be him. The caller claimed that he was holding a gun to his own head and that he was holding his son hostage. As a result of this call, the police rushed to Pengies' old address thinking they were entering a hostage situation. I believe Captain Pengies is telling us the truth and someone did try to take the drama into real life. This reckless action must be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Captain Pengies believes that it was someone from Anonymous who did this, though he admitted it could be someone who had nothing to do with the those who are going after the Church of Scientology
Captain Pengies also mocked Anonymous because they have not been able to turn out massive crowds to protest against Scientology and because they have been ineffective. He also welcomed the leaders of Anonymous to get in touch with him.
The fact that Captain Pengies referred to the leaders of Anonymous indicates that he does not have a good grasp of the situation. Anonymous has no leaders. There is also some disagreement within Anonymous as to the tactics to be used against the Church. Anonymous is not a solid monolith as Pengies might believe. It is composed of thousands of people working both independently and in loose coordination to reach its goals. This is a great video discussing the history of Anonymous:
youtube.com/watch?v=x0WCLKzDFpI
We don't know if the individual who called the police was part of Anonymous or whether he was someone who was butthurt after being powned by Pengies in the past. If he was part of Anonymous, his actions would probably be condemned by the vast majority of Anonymous. There are some bad apples within Anonymous, no doubt, as there are within any group of thousands of people. He does not represent Anonymous and whatever he did, he did not do it in the name of Anonymous.
Pengies also takes issue with Anonymous' denial of service attacks against the Church of Scientology. However, given the Church's long history of trying to destroy their critics, this was a very mild and short-lived attack against the Church. I challenge you, Captain Pengies, to do an hour or two of research about the Church and Anonymous. Captain You will then be better able to understand the atmosphere of fear and intimidation that the Church used to suppress its critics from questioning its practices. Once you understand the Church's real-life bullying—bullying that goes well beyond frivolous litigiousness, I think you will understand why I think the DOS was morally justifiable, though tactically questionable.
Here are some places for you to start your research.
My page where I make my claim that the DOS was morally justifiable:
themaskedanalyst.com/Sceintology%20and%20the%20DMCA.htm
The three women behind this next site are former members who were raised in the Church of Scientology. One of them is the niece of the leader of Scientology. She has left the Church, and is now one of their most important critics.
exscientologykids.com/admins.html
A couple of other good sites to learn about Scientology:
xenu.net
xenutv.com
Check out these videos by ToryMagoo44. She was in the Church of Scientology for roughly 30 years. She rose to the second highest level (OT7) of the Church before she left it and became a critic. Here are several videos that she made about Anonymous and the Church of Scientology that you should watch.
youtube.com/watch?v=labLPjcFrRw
youtube.com/watch?v=uZr2zQ-Eiws
youtube.com/watch?v=2J-AcPO_ru8
Of course, if you want to do a thorough evaluation of Scientology, then you will want to hear their side of the story. You can do that by visiting these sites.
scientology.org
religiousfreedomwatch.org
Finally, this is the video that redskull falsely DMCAd to get me suspended.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtKXb2...
Does Thepiratesguild really want to associate with someone who makes death threats and commits perjury?
