A Flaw in Aquinas’s Case for the Essence-Existence Distinction @RealAtheology
A Flaw in Aquinas’s Case for the Essence-Existence Distinction  @RealAtheology
Uploaded May 2024 | Updated September 2026, 3 hours ago
Aquinas tries to show essence is really distinct from existence via an argument from knowledge. The proof is reminiscent of Mary’s Room, which purports to establish that the mind is not purely physical, since one can know all physical facts without knowing all mental facts. But like that knowledge argument against physicalism, Aquinas’s argument fails. Nonetheless, his conclusion is plausible.
A Flaw in Aquinas’s Case for the Essence-Existence DistinctionTheres NO evidence for God.RA031: Dustin Crummett on Suffering, Spiders, and SimulationsDoes God Exist? Ben Watkins vs. Trent HornDebate: God & Religious Disagreement (Schieber & Rauser on Unbelievable?)Understating the EvidenceTheism and Moral ObjectivityRA040: Jeff Lowder on Philosophy of ReligionPete Mandik on Materialism, Quine, and Religious MysticismTheism and the Concept of LifeRA011: Interview: Counter Apologist on God and EthicsRA015: Debating the Problem of Evil with Justin Schieber and Cameron Bertuzzi
Real Atheology |

A Flaw in Aquinas’s Case for the Essence-Existence Distinction

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER