Uploaded January 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
She gets more and more deranged with each passing day. I note also that within the video I am referring to here she goes back to using the stolen digital art with the sky pattern - no respect for the artist whatsoever - he should sue her sorry arse!
CREDITS:
WORLD OF SIGNS NARED KING via YT
Stand with HK 1450 Watson Shen via Twitter
newcivilengineer.com
taiwannews.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Burning Bridges" by Blue Stahli
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
She gets more and more deranged with each passing day. I note also that within the video I am referring to here she goes back to using the stolen digital art with the sky pattern - no respect for the artist whatsoever - he should sue her sorry arse!
CREDITS:
WORLD OF SIGNS NARED KING via YT
Stand with HK 1450 Watson Shen via Twitter
newcivilengineer.com
taiwannews.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Burning Bridges" by Blue Stahli
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
